Wednesday Evening Pairs

April 10, 2024 Game Result


? Explanation of report features   View original ACBLscore output
Download hands in PBN or PBN+ or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Field strength:  Mean: 793 MP  Geomean: 589 MP
(based on 16 players)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Laurie Naemura - Skip Ludington 66.67 1st A 0.80
Christy Wiegel - Ellie Hall-Pitzer 57.74 2nd A 0.56
Don Brockhaus - Wing Yung 52.98 3rd A 0.40
EVENT>Wednesday Evening Pairs  |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 10, 2024     |CLUB NO.>133876    | 04/10/2024 22:14
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Kevin Kacmarynsk|RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/500  |CLUB>Salem Bridge Club        
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=6/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Ellie Hall-Pitzer      Christy Wiegel           A    2     .     .     48.50  57.74  0.56(A) 
 2 Shain Oleson           Jerome Gordon            A    .     .     .     39.50  47.02          
 3 Jeff Wiegel            Victor Langhans          B    .     .     .     43.00  51.19          
 4 Kevin Kacmarynski      Lynne Hardin             B    .     .     .     33.00  39.29          
 5 Wing Yung              Don Brockhaus            B    3     2     .     44.50  52.98  0.40(A) 
 6 Shirley Scofield       Shirley Carlson          B    .     .     .     36.00  42.86          
 7 Ross Hibler            B (Jeanne) Hibler        C    .     .     .     35.50  42.26          
 8 Skip Ludington         Laurie Naemura           C    1     1     .     56.00  66.67  0.80(A) 
                                          Totals                         336.00       

Hands and Results
1 ♠84
K9832
AK763
♣4
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AKQJ65
J6
92
♣A83
♠T9
Q754
QJ5
♣QJ97
♠732
AT
T84
♣KT652
10
158
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1  ♣6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 3NT  ♦4 ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  3N E -1   T  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W 3    A  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W 3    K  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ W 3    A  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
2 ♠A
JT542
9764
♣742
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T8643
KQ
53
♣AKT5
♠K972
86
QJT82
♣98
♠QJ5
A973
AK
♣QJ63
5
126
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣6 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.50   0.50  2 S 3    ♠3  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
  140          2.50   0.50  2 S 3    ♣A  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
  100          1.00   2.00  4♠ W -2   J  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        110    0.00   3.00  2♠ W 2    A  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
3 ♠87
QT5
Q8754
♣KQ2
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KQJ32
J4
AK6
♣A85
♠954
963
T9
♣J9763
♠AT6
AK872
J32
♣T4
9
181
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2  ♣5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1/2♣ 2♠  ♦4 ♥4 NT5/6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  2♠ W -1   5  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -2   A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        110    1.00   2.00  2♠ W 2    5  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        140    0.00   3.00  3♠ W 3    ♣K  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
4 ♠A65
T7643
4
♣AQ72
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K2
K
JT932
♣K9543
♠JT3
Q982
AK87
♣J6
♠Q9874
AJ5
Q65
♣T8
10
1011
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦5
EW: 1♣ 2  ♥4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3 N 3    A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      6-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
5 ♠A862
AK5
75
♣J742
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠JT9543
T9
Q86
♣95
♠7
QJ72
KT943
♣QT6
♠KQ
8643
AJ2
♣AK83
12
38
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 3 3♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.00   1.00  3N S 3    ♠J  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
  600          2.00   1.00  3N S 3    ♠J  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  600          2.00   1.00  3N S 3    ♣9  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
  150          0.00   3.00  2♠ E -3   A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
6 ♠QT742
5
A54
♣QJ52
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠853
KT4
T9763
♣74
♠AKJ96
72
QJ82
♣98
♠-
AQJ9863
K
♣AKT63
9
311
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 7♣ 6 1♠ 3/2NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣0 ♥1 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +1440 7♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          2.00   1.00  4 S 6    ♠8  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
  480          2.00   1.00  4 S 6    T  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
  480          2.00   1.00  4 S 6    7  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  430          0.00   3.00  3N N 4    ♠A  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
7 ♠J4
K632
J85
♣J765
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ8
AQT97
A7
♣T43
♠A76532
J4
Q964
♣2
♠T9
85
KT32
♣AKQ98
6
157
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♥3 ♠2 NT5
EW: 3 4♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♦6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          3.00   0.00  2♣ S 2    ♠K  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        200    1.00   2.00  2♠ E 5    ♣A  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        200    1.00   2.00  2 W 5    ♣7  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
        200    1.00   2.00  4♣ S -2   ♠K  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
8 ♠QT83
QT942
AT
♣74
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A
AK8
KQ7
♣QJ9653
♠KJ765
J76
965
♣AK
♠942
53
J8432
♣T82
8
1912
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5♣ 3 4 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    2.50   0.50  4♠ E 4    5  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        420    2.50   0.50  5♣ E 6    T  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
        460    0.50   2.50  3N W 5    ♠3  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        460    0.50   2.50  3N W 5    4  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
9 ♠J4
AJ82
A75
♣Q964
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠82
T5
K9843
♣KT53
♠KQ965
Q63
QJ6
♣A7
♠AT73
K974
T2
♣J82
12
614
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1♠  ♦5 NT6
EW: 2  ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2 N 2    Q  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
  100          2.00   1.00  2♠ E -1   9  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        100    1.00   2.00  1N S -2   ♠8  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        120    0.00   3.00  1N W 2    2  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
10 ♠985
J54
QT75
♣KT7
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J4
Q982
AK63
♣A96
♠AKT62
AKT7
J9
♣54
♠Q73
63
842
♣QJ832
6
1415
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2
EW: 3♣ 4 6 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -1430 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    3.00   0.00  4 E 4    8  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        650    2.00   1.00  4 E 5    ♣3  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
        680    0.50   2.50  4 E 6    8  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        680    0.50   2.50  4 E 6    ♣Q  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
11 ♠AQ7
Q954
7632
♣72
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠532
J876
KJ9
♣653
♠KT964
AT2
8
♣QJT9
♠J8
K3
AQT54
♣AK84
8
510
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 2 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5
LoTT: 14 - 17 = -3
Par: +110 2-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2 S 3    ♠2  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
   90          2.00   1.00  2 S 2    ♠2  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
         50    1.00   2.00  2N S -1   6  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
        100    0.00   3.00  3N S -2   8  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
12 ♠J743
963
JT52
♣T7
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AT86
T5
AQ986
♣Q8
♠K92
A74
4
♣KJ9642
♠Q5
KQJ82
K73
♣A53
2
1211
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5♣ 2 1 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -400 5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  3N E -1   K  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
   50          2.50   0.50  3N E -1   J  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
        100    1.00   2.00  2 S -1   8  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        120    0.00   3.00  1N E 2    K  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
13 ♠AKQT8
J43
5
♣K983
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠963
KT75
KQJ98
♣Q
♠2
862
T7432
♣J752
♠J754
AQ9
A6
♣AT64
13
111
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 2 6♠ 5NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +1400 7*-EW-5
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          3.00   0.00  4♠ N 5    ♠2  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        100    1.50   1.50  6♠ N -1   T  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        100    1.50   1.50  6♠ N -1   2  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        200    0.00   3.00  7♠ N -2   T  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
14 ♠T86
62
JT3
♣J7642
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K4
AKJ87
96
♣Q853
♠AQJ2
93
KQ542
♣A9
♠9753
QT54
A87
♣KT
2
1316
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT2
EW: 3♣ 5/4 6/5 5♠ 5NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -980 6-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  6 W -3   ♣2  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        430    1.50   1.50  3N E 4    4  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
        430    1.50   1.50  3N E 4    4  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        460    0.00   3.00  3N E 5    4  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
15 ♠KJ4
A9862
AQ953
♣-
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AT63
T54
87
♣K954
♠Q95
KQ
KJT42
♣AJ6
♠872
J73
6
♣QT8732
14
716
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5/4
EW: 1♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥5
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   1.00  3* E -1  J  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  100          2.00   1.00  2 E -2   3  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
  100          2.00   1.00  2 E -2   3  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
   50          0.00   3.00  2N E -1   3  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
16 ♠T2
8
T983
♣T97632
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJ54
AT642
QJ5
♣A
♠KQ973
KQJ975
7
♣5
♠86
3
AK642
♣KQJ84
0
1611
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6 6♠ 5NT  ♣5 ♦5
LoTT: 20 - 22 = -2
Par: -1100 7*-NS/7♣*-NS-5
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        680    2.50   0.50  5 W 6    ♣T  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        680    2.50   0.50  4 W 6    T  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        800    1.00   2.00  6♣* S -4  ♠A  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
       1660    0.00   3.00  6* W 6   ♣T  7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
17 ♠KQT
8
QT62
♣AQT74
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A972
AKQ74
K75
♣3
♠J863
T653
98
♣J86
♠54
J92
AJ43
♣K952
13
162
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4  ♥4 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 3♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +100 4♠*-EW/4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.50   0.50  3 S 4    A  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  130          2.50   0.50  3♣ N 4    7  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        170    0.50   2.50  2 W 4    ♠K  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        170    0.50   2.50  2 W 4    ♠Q  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
18 ♠AQ95
64
AJ62
♣AK6
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KT6
KT73
KT94
♣Q7
♠J3
AJ982
Q85
♣932
♠8742
Q5
73
♣JT854
18
118
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT  ♦6/5 ♥4
EW: 1 2/3  ♣4 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +100 4*-W-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00  1N N 2    8  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
   90          1.50   1.50  1N N 1    8  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
   90          1.50   1.50  1 N 2    ♠J  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
   70          0.00   3.00  1 N 1    ♠J  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
19 ♠QT94
T5
53
♣KQT64
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J63
KJ642
K
♣A753
♠A8
Q93
AT987
♣982
♠K752
A87
QJ642
♣J
7
1210
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT5
EW: 1 3 1NT  ♣6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3 W -1   5  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
    PASS       1.50   1.50  Pass Out      3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
    PASS       1.50   1.50  Pass Out      8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        170    0.00   3.00  1 W 4    ♣K  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
20 ♠A5
T96
QJ64
♣KT52
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J86
AQ542
A92
♣J3
♠KT9732
3
K3
♣A864
♠Q4
KJ87
T875
♣Q97
10
1210
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥5/4 ♠2 NT3
EW: 2♣ 1 2 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00  1N N 2    4  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
        110    2.00   1.00  2♠ E 2    7  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        200    0.50   2.50  2♠ E 5    5  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        200    0.50   2.50  2♠ E 5    ♣7  1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
21 ♠T7
AQ762
Q9
♣KQJ5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠6
43
AKJ32
♣A8742
♠954
J985
T86
♣T96
♠AKQJ832
KT
754
♣3
14
121
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW: 1♣ 1/-
       ♦7/6 ♥3/1 ♠2 NT3/1
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S 5    A  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S 5    A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  620          0.50   2.50  4♠ S 4    4  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
  620          0.50   2.50  4♠ S 4    A  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
22 ♠A4
T7
QJ3
♣KQJ853
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T97653
AJ32
A
♣A7
♠J82
KQ986
T765
♣T
♠KQ
54
K9842
♣9642
13
136
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2  ♥2 ♠2 NT6
EW: 5 5♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -650 5♠-EW/5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.50   0.50  3♣ N 3    ♠2  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
  110          2.50   0.50  3♣ N 3    K  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
        200    0.50   2.50  3♠ W 5    ♣K  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        200    0.50   2.50  3♠ W 5    ♣K  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
23 ♠AJ83
QJT2
752
♣Q4
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K542
9864
QT8
♣J7
♠T6
A5
AKJ63
♣K652
♠Q97
K73
94
♣AT983
10
615
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 2♠ 1NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   1.00  2N E -1   ♣T  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
  100          2.00   1.00  2 E -1   3  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
  100          2.00   1.00  2 E -1   4  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
         90    0.00   3.00  2 E 2    3  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
24 ♠3
KQT53
AJ632
♣J5
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠862
94
KT874
♣AQ7
♠KJ754
A762
Q
♣T98
♠AQT9
J8
95
♣K6432
11
910
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 1 1NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥5 NT5/6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    3.00   0.00  3 N -1   ♠5  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        100    2.00   1.00  4 N -2   ♠K  2-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        150    0.50   2.50  4 N -3   ♠4  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Scofield-Carlson
        150    0.50   2.50  3 N -3   A  4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
25 ♠J
JT8753
Q32
♣532
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠T954
-
KT74
♣K9876
♠K8763
A6
AJ
♣QJT4
♠AQ2
KQ942
9865
♣A
4
615
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/- 3  ♣3 ♦7/5 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 4♠  ♦6 ♥4/3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: -300 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  2N E -3   K  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
  200          1.50   1.50  4♠* E -1  ♣A  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
  200          1.50   1.50  4♠ E -2   ♣A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ E 4    ♣A  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
26 ♠K632
Q73
JT
♣AKQ3
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T87
AT4
52
♣T6542
♠Q4
K62
AKQ8764
♣9
♠AJ95
J985
93
♣J87
15
414
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3♠  ♦4 NT4
EW: 3  ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ S 3    5  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ N 3    A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        110    0.50   2.50  3 E 3    ♠5  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
        110    0.50   2.50  3 E 3    5  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
27 ♠QJ5
JT7
85
♣QT643
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T943
K984
J742
♣8
♠AK762
32
A9
♣J952
♠8
AQ65
KQT63
♣AK7
6
412
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 2 1/-NT
       ♠4 NT7/6
EW: 3♠  ♣5/4 ♦5/4 ♥5/4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  3♣ N 3    ♠K  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
         50    1.50   1.50  3 S -1   ♠4  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
         50    1.50   1.50  3 S -1   ♣8  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel
        150    0.00   3.00  3N N -3   ♠6  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
28 ♠QT3
QT7
AKT5
♣Q65
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AJ
A962
Q63
♣J974
♠98
J54
J984
♣KT82
♠K76542
K83
72
♣A3
13
125
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1 1 4♠ 2NT  ♣6
EW:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          3.00   0.00  1N N 4    ♣2  5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
  170          2.00   1.00  2♠ S 4    A  8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
        100    0.50   2.50  1N N -1   ♣2  6-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Gordon
        100    0.50   2.50  4♠ S -1   ♣4  3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Hall-Pitzer-Wiegel