Hands and Results
1 |
♠Q2
♥K942
♦AT96
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 4-Gille-French vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Oleson-Yung
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♥2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
120 0.00 3.00 1N E 2 ♠3 6-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
2 |
♠Q743
♥K9
♦QT2
♣K763
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3/2 ♦4 NT4/3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 ♦5 6-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ E 3 ♥A 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Oleson-Yung
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ E 3 ♥A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♠J 4-Gille-French vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
|
3 |
♠Q94
♥KT865
♦-
♣A8543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 5/4♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥3/4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 ♦J 4-Gille-French vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♣T 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Oleson-Yung
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦K 6-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
4 |
♠T
♥A9642
♦T32
♣AJ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5/4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥* W -1 ♥5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦Q 4-Gille-French vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♠K 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Oleson-Yung
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 ♠T 6-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
5 |
♠KQT9
♥4
♦KQT5
♣8763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
50 2.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♦6 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Yung
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 ♠5 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 6-Crooch-Reed
120 0.00 3.00 2N E 2 ♦8 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 4-Gille-French
|
6 |
♠Q5
♥984
♦KJ76
♣J832
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♣8 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 6-Crooch-Reed
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♣3 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 4-Gille-French
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 ♣A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
7 |
♠AJ
♥KJ852
♦865
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣2 ♦2/1 ♠1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 6♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ S -2 ♠9 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 6-Crooch-Reed
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ S -2 ♠9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 ♥4 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 4-Gille-French
800 0.00 3.00 5♥* S -3 ♠7 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
8 |
♠T632
♥KT64
♦9754
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 6/5♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6N W -1 ♠2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
400 2.00 1.00 5♦ W 5 ♣2 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 4-Gille-French
430 1.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♣5 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 6-Crooch-Reed
460 0.00 3.00 3N W 5 ♦9 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
9 |
♠AJ32
♥K97
♦964
♣AT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 4/5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♣6 6-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Gille-French
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 4 ♣K 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣K 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
120 0.00 3.00 2N N 2 ♠4 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
10 |
♠AJ93
♥2
♦AQJT862
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 ♥6 6-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Gille-French
100 1.50 1.50 6♠ S -1 ♦3 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♦2 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
300 0.00 3.00 6♠ S -3 ♦3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
11 |
♠AT
♥AT642
♦987
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ W 2 ♠A 6-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Gille-French
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ W 3 ♠A 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ W 3 ♦8 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Oleson-Yung
180 0.00 3.00 2N E 4 ♥9 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
12 |
♠QJ76
♥Q
♦QJ873
♣K96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 5♠ N 5 ♥5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Oleson-Yung
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 5 ♣A 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ N 5 ♥5 6-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Gille-French
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ S 4 ♣Q 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
|
13 |
♠9865
♥AT9
♦6
♣KQ985
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 1♥ E -3 ♦K 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
130 2.00 1.00 2♦ S 4 ♠2 3-Oleson-Yung vs 6-Crooch-Reed
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ S 3 ♣A 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
90 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♥3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Gille-French
|
14 |
♠9642
♥AKQ
♦Q5
♣KJ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♥5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Gille-French
50 2.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♥J 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
100 1.00 2.00 2N N -2 ♥7 3-Oleson-Yung vs 6-Crooch-Reed
150 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 ♦A 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
15 |
♠62
♥Q9763
♦K9
♣AT76
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠7/6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠6 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♠6 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♠Q 3-Oleson-Yung vs 6-Crooch-Reed
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♠5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Gille-French
|
16 |
♠J85
♥AKQ85
♦A
♣K842
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ S 4 ♦K 3-Oleson-Yung vs 6-Crooch-Reed
150 1.50 1.50 3♣ N 5 ♦5 7-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
50 0.17 2.83 5♣ N -1 ♦J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Gille-French
|
17 |
♠Q
♥J3
♦K954
♣A97632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♠2 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Crooch-Reed
210 2.00 1.00 2N N 5 ♦3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ S 4 ♠6 4-Gille-French vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ N 2 ♣T 3-Oleson-Yung vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
|
18 |
♠KT852
♥AQ84
♦AT5
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 1N E -4 ♠3 3-Oleson-Yung vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
200 2.50 0.50 2♠ N 5 ♥3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ N 4 ♥7 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Crooch-Reed
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ N 4 ♣2 4-Gille-French vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
|
19 |
♠A7
♥T93
♦Q6432
♣T87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N S 1 ♦7 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
50 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥6 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Crooch-Reed
50 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♣K 3-Oleson-Yung vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
50 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♣K 4-Gille-French vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
|
20 |
♠AQT832
♥97
♦T9
♣K43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 ♠A 4-Gille-French vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
200 2.00 1.00 1♥ W 5 ♥7 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♣3 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Crooch-Reed
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♣3 3-Oleson-Yung vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
|
21 |
♠AJ75
♥Q53
♦JT9
♣K74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 ♠A 4-Gille-French vs 3-Oleson-Yung
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 ♥J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Crooch-Reed
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠A 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
|
22 |
♠-
♥AQ4
♦QJT962
♣J953
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ -/1NT ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N N -4 ♠Q 4-Gille-French vs 3-Oleson-Yung
500 1.50 1.50 5♦* N -3 ♥6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Crooch-Reed
500 1.50 1.50 4♦* N -3 ♠Q 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
730 0.00 3.00 3♠* E 3 ♦3 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
|
23 |
♠T2
♥A9764
♦J62
♣A84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N S 1 ♦4 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Crooch-Reed
100 0.50 2.50 1N S -1 ♦A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
100 0.50 2.50 1N S -1 ♦4 4-Gille-French vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
24 |
♠QJ6
♥K43
♦KT92
♣J82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 2 ♦T 2-Carlson-Hasbrook vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 2 ♦T 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
90 1.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 ♦A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Crooch-Reed
50 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦T 4-Gille-French vs 3-Oleson-Yung
|
25 |
♠-
♥AJ
♦T864
♣KJT9875
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
50 1.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
50 1.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 ♠3 3-Oleson-Yung vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
100 0.00 3.00 5♣* N -1 ♠A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Gille-French
|
26 |
♠KQ4
♥K65
♦J3
♣KQ876
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3/2 ♠3/2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦K 3-Oleson-Yung vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♦K 6-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 ♣4 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Gille-French
|
27 |
♠J3
♥985
♦KT972
♣AKQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2/1 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♣T 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Gille-French
460 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 ♥Q 3-Oleson-Yung vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 ♥Q 6-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
|
28 |
♠K6542
♥A543
♦Q7
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♦9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Scofield-Kleen
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Gille-French
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 ♠J 3-Oleson-Yung vs 1-Nevins-Hall-Pitzer
140 1.00 2.00 1♠ N 3 ♣A 6-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Carlson-Hasbrook
|