Hands and Results
1 |
♠Q53
♥AT
♦AJT83
♣J64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦5 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♣4 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 ♥A 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
2 |
♠T86
♥AK983
♦-
♣Q8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♥ 5♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥1 ♠1/2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3♥ N 5 ♣6 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
200 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 5 ♣6 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 4 ♦A 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
3 |
♠K7
♥QT7543
♦T93
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ W 4 ♣A 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
150 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -3 ♠5 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♠3 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
4 |
♠752
♥K7543
♦Q
♣T982
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N S 2 ♦4 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
110 1.00 1.00 1♠ S 2 ♦4 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♠Q 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
5 |
♠KQT743
♥AJ4
♦T62
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♣A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♣A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Reed-Crooch
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 ♠A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
|
6 |
♠KT65
♥6
♦AT72
♣K765
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 1/2NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥Q 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 ♣2 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
50 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -1 ♥A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
7 |
♠JT96
♥53
♦QJ3
♣J852
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 5♦ W 6 ♠J 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
660 1.00 1.00 3N W 5 ♠J 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
1370 0.00 2.00 6♦ W 6 ♠J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
8 |
♠AQ75
♥J62
♦975
♣863
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 3/2♣ 5♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♦K 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♦K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Reed-Crooch
50 0.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 ♦K 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
9 |
♠Q3
♥Q732
♦Q74
♣JT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N W 2 ♥2 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
600 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♣2 2-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
630 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♥2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
|
10 |
♠93
♥T764
♦A852
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N E 2 ♠4 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 ♠A 2-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
630 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
|
11 |
♠AT
♥5
♦K9843
♣Q8765
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣5 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
430 1.00 1.00 3N E 4 ♥6 2-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
460 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
|
12 |
♠J9432
♥T8
♦98
♣J962
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥Q 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 ♥Q 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ W 2 ♥T 2-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
13 |
♠65
♥AKT92
♦AJ93
♣76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 4 ♠4 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
200 1.00 1.00 6♦ N -2 ♣A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
300 0.00 2.00 6N S -3 ♠3 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
14 |
♠KT2
♥543
♦AKJ3
♣J32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♥A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ W -2 ♦A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
100 0.00 2.00 3♠* S -1 ♣9 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
15 |
♠T
♥AQJ832
♦9832
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♠* E -1 ♥K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
100 1.00 1.00 5♥ S -1 ♦J 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♥7 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
16 |
♠T65
♥976
♦A9
♣AK942
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 ♣A 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♣A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♣A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
|
17 |
♠K75432
♥AJ2
♦AT
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♦4 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Reed-Crooch
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♥Q 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♥3 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
18 |
♠K2
♥QT942
♦AT
♣T987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ -/1NT ♦5 ♥6 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠6 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ W -2 ♠2 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Reed-Crooch
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ W -2 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
|
19 |
♠9865
♥AQJ82
♦Q
♣Q75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 ♣A 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
50 0.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
20 |
♠J64
♥T95
♦A32
♣AJ84
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N N 1 ♥A 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Reed-Crooch
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ W 3 ♠4 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Ludington-Naemura
120 0.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♣4 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
21 |
♠AKJ
♥4
♦AT76
♣KJ932
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 ♥A 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
590 1.00 1.00 4♥* W 4 ♠A 2-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
1400 0.00 2.00 5♦* S -5 ♥A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
22 |
♠A75
♥KQ8
♦QT64
♣K65
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♣J 2-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦4 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
90 0.00 2.00 1N N 1 ♣4 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
23 |
♠A973
♥J2
♦Q82
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♦4 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
90 0.50 1.50 1N S 1 ♣4 2-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
90 0.50 1.50 1N N 1 ♠J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
|
24 |
♠K76
♥JT98
♦874
♣J62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N E 2 ♣7 2-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♥J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Oleson-Jordan
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♥J 4-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Yung-Hall-Pitzer
|
25 |
♠J4
♥KT6
♦Q98762
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 ♦J 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 ♣J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 ♣6 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
26 |
♠AQ732
♥854
♦843
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣T 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Reed-Crooch
200 1.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♣9 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
150 0.00 2.00 2N E 3 ♣A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
27 |
♠J98
♥AJ2
♦K8
♣AJT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♣T 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Reed-Crooch
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♠8 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -3 ♠A 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
|
28 |
♠QT76
♥AQT43
♦T9
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♠3 6-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Reed-Crooch
660 0.50 1.50 3N S 5 ♠3 5-Ludington-Naemura vs 4-Scofield-Carlson
660 0.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♦K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|