Hands and Results
1 |
♠92
♥A6
♦AQJ765
♣953
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 1/2♠ ♣4 ♦5/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 ♠Q 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
50 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♠5 4-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
50 0.50 1.50 4♦ N -1 ♠7 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
2 |
♠3
♥J975
♦AQ63
♣T976
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N W 4 ♠3 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
400 1.00 1.00 5♣ E 5 ♠Q 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
460 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♦A 4-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
|
3 |
♠T974
♥542
♦932
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥0/1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ W 6 ♣Q 4-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ W 6 ♣Q 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
710 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 7 ♦9 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
4 |
♠KQT
♥J2
♦AQ742
♣Q86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 ♦A 4-Crooch-Reed vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
200 1.00 1.00 3♦ N -2 ♠9 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
400 0.00 2.00 3N N -4 ♠9 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
5 |
♠K86
♥JT54
♦KT9765
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -2 ♦J 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Crooch-Reed
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♥J 8-Hibler-Brand vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♣4 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
6 |
♠J9873
♥742
♦KJ873
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 4♠* S 5 ♥A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
600 0.50 1.50 5♣ W 5 ♠3 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
600 0.50 1.50 5♣ E 5 ♠A 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Crooch-Reed
|
7 |
♠AT9
♥AQ
♦JT92
♣A765
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -3 ♥3 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Crooch-Reed
120 1.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♦A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥3 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
8 |
♠4
♥A652
♦AT9875
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.75 0.25 4♠ W 4 ♠4 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
430 0.25 1.75 3N W 4 ♥2 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Crooch-Reed
|
9 |
♠98764
♥AJT64
♦J
♣53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♦9 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 ♣A 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
150 0.00 2.00 1N W 3 ♥J 8-Hibler-Brand vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
10 |
♠T86
♥KQT863
♦765
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♣A 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 ♣K 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
230 0.00 2.00 3♥ S 6 ♠7 8-Hibler-Brand vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
11 |
♠KJT53
♥98
♦Q6
♣T862
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ S 3 ♥K 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ S 3 ♦J 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 5 ♣A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
12 |
♠AKQ53
♥JT43
♦Q8
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 7♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 1.00 1.00 6♥ S 7 ♣T 1-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
1460 1.00 1.00 6♥ S 7 ♣T 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
1460 1.00 1.00 6♥ N 7 ♦3 8-Hibler-Brand vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
13 |
♠QJ632
♥AQ
♦AK9
♣J82
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♠7 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Crooch-Reed
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♥6 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♥6 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
14 |
♠AQ65
♥AJ53
♦K2
♣T82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♠2 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
50 0.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♦4 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
50 0.50 1.50 2♣ N -1 ♥7 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Crooch-Reed
|
15 |
♠AT52
♥A4
♦Q865
♣943
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♣A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Crooch-Reed
200 0.50 1.50 3♠ S 5 ♣A 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
200 0.50 1.50 3♠ N 5 ♣A 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
16 |
♠QT72
♥72
♦KT9
♣K987
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠9 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
230 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 6 ♦6 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Crooch-Reed
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 5 ♠3 7-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
17 |
♠5
♥AQ96542
♦32
♣973
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4/5♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4/2 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♥7 4-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
50 0.50 1.50 5♥ N -1 ♠A 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♣5 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
18 |
♠AKJ82
♥AKT7
♦AK
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1NT ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠1 NT3/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 5 ♣A 4-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 ♣A 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
100 0.00 2.00 3♣* E -1 ♠T 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
19 |
♠AKQJ64
♥AJ2
♦KJ8
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 3/2♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 ♣5 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣5 4-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣5 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
20 |
♠963
♥A7
♦AJ9
♣AKT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣Q 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♣2 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Ludington-Naemura
100 0.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 ♦4 4-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
|
21 |
♠KQT976
♥A
♦AQJ
♣T93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 ♦7 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
600 1.00 1.00 3N S 3 ♣4 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 ♣2 4-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
22 |
♠T4
♥AQ3
♦Q93
♣AK965
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 2N N 3 ♠7 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
150 1.50 0.50 2N N 3 ♠4 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♣J 4-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
|
23 |
♠J7
♥AQT643
♦KQ7
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 ♣T 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
230 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 6 ♣T 4-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 ♣8 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
|
24 |
♠J2
♥K75
♦AK4
♣AJ832
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3/2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2/1 ♥2/1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 ♠7 2-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 5 ♠5 4-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Oleson-Gordon
100 0.00 2.00 6♥ N -2 ♠7 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
25 |
♠T986
♥A74
♦A4
♣QT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 1/2NT ♥6 ♠4/5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♦ S 3 ♠A 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Crooch-Reed
110 1.50 0.50 2♦ S 3 ♠A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♠A 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
26 |
♠K5
♥QJ8
♦QJT764
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♠6 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Crooch-Reed
630 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♣4 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
210 0.00 2.00 2N N 5 ♣T 8-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
|
27 |
♠KQ2
♥K5
♦KJ74
♣AT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 2 ♠A 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Crooch-Reed
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 2 ♠8 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♠8 8-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
|
28 |
♠7
♥T32
♦K63
♣KQ9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣A 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Crooch-Reed
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♦2 3-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Wiegel-Wiegel
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♣A 8-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Scofield-Carlson
|