Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠Q542
♥KT5
♦KT987
♣3
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣3 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 1-Crooch-Reed
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♣3 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 2-Hibler-Brand
150 0.00 2.00 2N W 3 ♦8 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 2 |
♠J43
♥Q4
♦T6543
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♥2 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
430 1.00 1.00 3N W 4 ♦4 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 2-Hibler-Brand
490 0.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♦9 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
| 3 |
♠A543
♥J
♦J932
♣K653
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥0 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣3 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 6 ♠3 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 1-Crooch-Reed
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 6 ♣3 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 2-Hibler-Brand
|
| 4 |
♠QJ97
♥AT9
♦A52
♣J93
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 5 ♥Q 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 1-Crooch-Reed
150 1.00 1.00 2N S 3 ♣2 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 2-Hibler-Brand
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥Q 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 5 |
♠7
♥8754
♦KQJ93
♣632
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 2 ♦8 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 2-Hibler-Brand
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 2 ♣K 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
100 0.00 2.00 1♠ S -1 ♣K 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
| 6 |
♠J863
♥A32
♦42
♣AT82
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣6/5 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♠A 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ S -2 ♠A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 2-Hibler-Brand
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 ♥A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
| 7 |
♠93
♥QT97
♦AQ64
♣Q74
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5/6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 ♦4 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 2-Hibler-Brand
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 4 ♥T 1-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 5 ♥7 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 8 |
♠AT8
♥Q5
♦KQ82
♣QJ53
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2/3NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♥5 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 2-Hibler-Brand
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ S 4 ♣A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
100 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -2 ♠Q 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 9 |
♠QT65
♥Q72
♦K97
♣964
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5/4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ W 3 ♠5 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ W 4 ♠T 1-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 4 ♠5 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 2-Hibler-Brand
|
| 10 |
♠J9864
♥AJ
♦J5
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠4 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 2-Hibler-Brand
150 1.00 1.00 2N W 3 ♠4 4-Scofield-Nevins vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♠6 1-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
| 11 |
♠873
♥AKQJ8
♦765
♣87
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♥4 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
90 1.00 1.00 1N E 1 ♦9 2-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Crooch-Reed
120 0.00 2.00 1N E 2 ♠5 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 12 |
♠J96
♥J74
♦K983
♣A98
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 3/4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N W 4 ♦3 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
400 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 ♥2 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♦3 2-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
| 13 |
♠A2
♥43
♦T7642
♣Q752
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 3 ♥A 2-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Crooch-Reed
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♥A 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♥A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 14 |
♠QJT
♥JT43
♦T7
♣AQJ7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♠Q 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ W -3 ♠Q 2-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Crooch-Reed
550 0.00 2.00 3N* E 3 ♠5 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson
|
| 15 |
♠J542
♥73
♦KT963
♣43
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥6/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.75 0.25 1N S 2 ♣6 2-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Crooch-Reed
200 0.25 1.75 3N S -2 ♣6 5-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
|
| 16 |
♠AQ42
♥AT8
♦973
♣654
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5/4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ W 3 ♥8 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
120 1.00 1.00 2N W 2 ♠2 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 1-Crooch-Reed
690 0.00 2.00 3N W 6 ♦9 2-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
| 17 |
♠KQJ6
♥Q9643
♦82
♣T2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♦J 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 1-Crooch-Reed
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 ♦J 2-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
200 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -4 ♣3 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
|
| 18 |
♠KQ543
♥K7
♦JT87
♣K4
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣1/3 ♦4/5 ♥4 NT4/6 |
| EW: 4/3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.00 0.00 1♥ E 1 ♣J 2-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 1-Crooch-Reed
170 0.00 2.00 1♥ E 4 ♣J 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
|
| 19 |
♠754
♥K95
♦A8652
♣K5
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♦A 2-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♦A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♠5 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
| 20 |
♠J9
♥K765
♦J
♣AT9762
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 4 ♠A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ W 2 ♣A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 1-Crooch-Reed
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♣A 2-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
| 21 |
♠T97
♥KQ6
♦9
♣AKT842
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 ♠A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♠A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
300 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -3 ♠A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 2-Hibler-Brand
|
| 22 |
♠932
♥AT874
♦J5
♣K96
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♦9 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♦4 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 2-Hibler-Brand
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♦3 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
|
| 23 |
♠J5
♥AK93
♦T83
♣AQ42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N N 2 ♠2 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 2 ♣J 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥J 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 2-Hibler-Brand
|
| 24 |
♠54
♥T42
♦AKQ87
♣542
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 ♣A 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♦A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
180 0.00 2.00 2♣* W 2 ♦A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 2-Hibler-Brand
|
| 25 |
♠J642
♥T4
♦KJ4
♣AJ95
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -2 ♠5 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Scofield-Nevins
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 3-Hall-Pitzer-Carlson vs 2-Hibler-Brand
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 6-Hunt-Hoogewerff vs 5-Wiegel-Wiegel
|
