Hands and Results
1 |
♠Q5
♥AJ85
♦QJT96
♣J3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 1♦ N 3 ♠A 7-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
50 0.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♦A 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hibler-Brand
50 0.50 1.50 2♣ S -1 ♠J 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
2 |
♠KJ4
♥KJ97632
♦5
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 ♣A 7-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 ♣A 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hibler-Brand
800 0.00 2.00 5♥* N -3 ♣A 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
3 |
♠Q63
♥JT
♦A63
♣KT743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♣5 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hibler-Brand
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ S -1 ♣J 7-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 4 ♥J 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
4 |
♠Q6
♥A7643
♦K96
♣642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 ♣T 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Hibler-Brand
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 ♣T 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 5 ♠J 7-Crooch-Reed vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
|
5 |
♠A
♥QJ987
♦9432
♣J52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥T 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♦7 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♣A 7-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
|
6 |
♠KQ862
♥K3
♦K73
♣J93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠K 7-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♠6 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.00 2.00 1♠ N -2 ♥J 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
|
7 |
♠9
♥QT752
♦KQJ4
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 2♠ ♦7/6 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 4 ♦T 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 7-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦T 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
|
8 |
♠AQ96
♥AQ2
♦T72
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N S 3 ♣5 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♣J 7-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦J 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
|
9 |
♠84
♥KJ7542
♦J52
♣T6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -2 ♦A 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
600 1.00 1.00 5♣ W 5 ♠8 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
620 0.00 2.00 5♣ W 6 ♠8 1-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
10 |
♠KT952
♥QT
♦K952
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦3 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♦7 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♦A 1-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
11 |
♠62
♥Q93
♦J4
♣T98732
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣T 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♦K 1-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Crooch-Reed
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ W 2 ♣T 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
|
12 |
♠QT965
♥AT763
♦Q75
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -2 ♠7 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Yung-Brockhaus
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♥K 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ E 2 ♥K 1-Hibler-Brand vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
13 |
♠A74
♥QT63
♦765
♣T85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦7 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 1-Hibler-Brand
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♠Q 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
110 0.00 2.00 1♥ W 2 ♦7 7-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
14 |
♠AQJT432
♥53
♦83
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 2.00 0.00 4♠* N 4 ♦A 7-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 ♦A 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 1-Hibler-Brand
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ E 5 ♠K 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
|
15 |
♠9872
♥KT93
♦3
♣AT83
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣3 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
400 0.50 1.50 3N W 3 ♣3 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 1-Hibler-Brand
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♥5 7-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
16 |
♠AJ42
♥T
♦AKQT98
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ N -1 ♥A 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 1-Hibler-Brand
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♥A 7-Crooch-Reed vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
17 |
♠T3
♥K853
♦K873
♣K62
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦3 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 ♠T 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
460 0.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♠6 1-Hibler-Brand vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
|
18 |
♠76
♥KQT72
♦T97
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3/2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♠ S 4 ♣K 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ E -3 ♣3 1-Hibler-Brand vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣K 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
|
19 |
♠QT84
♥KT3
♦AT9
♣954
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5/6♣ 5/6♦ 1/2♥ 3/4♠ 3/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N E 5 ♠9 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
690 0.50 1.50 3N W 6 ♠6 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
690 0.50 1.50 3N W 6 ♣9 1-Hibler-Brand vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
|
20 |
♠6
♥985
♦J9874
♣Q532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 5 ♣A 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
680 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 ♣A 1-Hibler-Brand vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
680 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 ♣A 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
21 |
♠T52
♥A82
♦KT98
♣K82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4/5♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♥7 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hibler-Brand
430 0.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥4 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Crooch-Reed
430 0.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥3 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
|
22 |
♠T
♥AJ72
♦AKQJ32
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♦6 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hibler-Brand
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♣3 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
170 0.00 2.00 2♦ N 6 ♥3 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
23 |
♠KT75
♥J4
♦KJ83
♣KJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N E 2 ♥2 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hibler-Brand
180 1.00 1.00 2N W 4 ♠5 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♠5 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
24 |
♠AK54
♥AJ75
♦943
♣95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♦J 2-Scofield-Carlson vs 7-Crooch-Reed
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♥T 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Langhans-Wiegel
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥K 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Hibler-Brand
|
25 |
♠K8532
♥K
♦53
♣J9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥4 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 3♥ 6NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N E 4 ♥5 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Crooch-Reed
660 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 ♥J 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
660 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 ♥5 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hibler-Brand
|
26 |
♠QJT9
♥-
♦AKQT643
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♦A 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hibler-Brand
200 1.00 1.00 5♦ N -2 ♥9 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
800 0.00 2.00 6♦* N -3 ♥9 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
27 |
♠J
♥KT9832
♦A542
♣A8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 ♦Q 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hibler-Brand
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♥6 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠7 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|
28 |
♠J
♥KQT98642
♦983
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 3♠ 6NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 5♣ W 5 ♥K 6-Langhans-Wiegel vs 2-Scofield-Carlson
440 1.00 1.00 5♦ W 7 ♣J 3-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Hibler-Brand
940 0.00 2.00 6♦ W 7 ♠J 8-Ludington-Naemura vs 7-Crooch-Reed
|