Wednesday Evening Pairs

September 13, 2023 Game Result


? Explanation of report features   View original ACBLscore output
Download hands in PBN or PBN+ or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 686 MP  Geomean: 561 MP
(based on 17 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Jerome Gordon - Shain Oleson 65.28 1st A 0.90
Ellie Hall-Pitzer - Susan Bradford 62.50 2nd A 0.63
Miriam Brand - Ross Hibler 55.56 3rd A 0.45
Hayward D (Doug) Reed - Karen Crooch 50.00 1st B 0.40
Don Brockhaus - Wing Yung 48.61 2nd B 0.28
EVENT>Wednesday Evening Pairs  |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>September 13, 2023 |CLUB NO.>133876    | 09/13/2023 22:34
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jerry Gordon    |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Salem Bridge Club        
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=5/C=1                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Victor Langhans        Jeff Wiegel              B    .     .     .     34.50  47.92          
 2 Hayward D (Doug) Reed  Karen Crooch             C    4     1     .     36.00  50.00  0.40(B) 
 3 Ellie Hall-Pitzer      Susan Bradford           A    2     .     .     45.00  62.50  0.63(A) 
 4 Skip Ludington         Laurie Naemura           B    .     .     .     34.50  47.92          
 5 Shain Oleson           Jerome Gordon            A    1     .     .     47.00  65.28  0.90(A) 
 6 William Gille          Darrel Karbginsky        B    .     .     .     27.00  37.50          
 8 Ross Hibler            Miriam Brand             A    3     .     .     40.00  55.56  0.45(A) 
 9 Shirley Scofield       Shirley Carlson          A    .     .     .     25.00  34.72          
10 Wing Yung              Don Brockhaus            B    .     2     .     35.00  48.61  0.28(B) 
                                          Totals                         324.00       

Hands and Results
1 ♠A9843
-
KQ642
♣A83
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K
AQ8753
83
♣T964
♠QJ6
KT4
T97
♣KJ75
♠T752
J962
AJ5
♣Q2
13
910
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 5♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥4/5
EW: 2  ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          3.00   0.00  4♠ N 5    K  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  200          1.50   1.50  3♠ N 5    T  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  200          1.50   1.50  2♠ N 5    ♣J  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
  170          0.00   3.00  3♠ N 4    T  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
2 ♠KQ85
KT9
932
♣KQ6
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T432
63
AQJT
♣T94
♠J9
QJ42
74
♣AJ853
♠A76
A875
K865
♣72
13
79
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣5
EW: 2♣  ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00  1N S 2    A  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
   90          2.00   1.00  1N S 1    T  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
   80          1.00   2.00  1 S 1    6  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
        100    0.00   3.00  2N N -1   2  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
3 ♠A9632
K765
K7
♣KQ
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠85
98
AT9642
♣A75
♠KQ4
AQ42
J8
♣T832
♠JT7
JT3
Q53
♣J964
15
812
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4
EW: 2♣ 3 2NT  ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          3.00   0.00  1N N 1    ♣2  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
         50    1.50   1.50  2♠ N -1   J  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
         50    1.50   1.50  2♠ N -1   ♣2  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        180    0.00   3.00  2N E 4    ♠J  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
4 ♠-
76542
AQJT3
♣Q73
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AJ976
K
K9865
♣J4
♠KQT53
QJ98
-
♣9852
♠842
AT3
742
♣AKT6
9
128
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 4 2NT  ♠3
EW: 4♠  ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: -200 5*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
    PASS       2.50   0.50  Pass Out      5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
    PASS       2.50   0.50  Pass Out      8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ E 3    ♣A  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ W 4    ♣3  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
5 ♠KQ6
J96
Q42
♣J842
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠T983
AQ842
KJT9
♣-
♠7542
53
865
♣AT73
♠AJ
KT7
A73
♣KQ965
9
104
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 2NT  ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1 1♠  ♣4 ♥6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.50   0.50  3N S 3    4  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
  600          2.50   0.50  3N S 3    J  8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
  150          1.00   2.00  2 W -3   ♠K  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
        400    0.00   3.00  3N E 3    9  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
6 ♠Q7
QJ9876
3
♣A987
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AK86
K5
J62
♣JT42
♠JT9543
A32
T9
♣Q3
♠2
T4
AKQ8754
♣K65
9
127
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 3  ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♠  ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.50   0.50  4 N 4    ♠J  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
  420          2.50   0.50  4 N 4    ♠5  8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
  140          1.00   2.00  3 N 3    ♠J  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        100    0.00   3.00  4 N -2   ♣Q  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
7 ♠J865
5
KQ87
♣J953
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠T2
AKQT3
T94
♣K62
♠AQ9
98642
53
♣A84
♠K743
J7
AJ62
♣QT7
7
1210
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣6 ♥3 NT5
EW: 4 2NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -500 4♠*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  4 W -1   ♠5  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  100          2.50   0.50  4 W -1   K  2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        620    0.50   2.50  4 W 4    K  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        620    0.50   2.50  4 W 4    7  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
8 ♠A7
K2
AKQT972
♣AJ
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠9
984
J864
♣KT765
♠T2
AJT7653
53
♣93
♠KQJ86543
Q
-
♣Q842
21
45
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 6♠ 6NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦2 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  980          2.50   0.50  6♠ S 6    9  2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
  980          2.50   0.50  6♠ S 6    9  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
  520          1.00   2.00  3N N 7    J  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  400          0.00   3.00  5 N 5    A  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
9 ♠76
752
KQT632
♣54
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K
QT963
J5
♣AKJ32
♠AQT985
AK
A
♣T976
♠J432
J84
9874
♣Q8
5
1417
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT0
EW: 7♣ 2 7 6♠ 7NT
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        640    3.00   0.00  5♣ W 7    6  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        680    2.00   1.00  4♠ E 6    4  2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        690    1.00   2.00  3N E 6    4  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
       1390    0.00   3.00  6♣ W 7    K  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
10 ♠9732
98
Q84
♣Q954
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T5
QJ6
AK73
♣AT82
♠QJ8
KT53
T62
♣J73
♠AK64
A742
J95
♣K6
4
147
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2 1 2NT  ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   1.00  1N S -1   6  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
        100    2.00   1.00  1N S -1   A  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
        100    2.00   1.00  1N S -1   3  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        110    0.00   3.00  2 E 2    ♠A  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
11 ♠JT
A75
KT4
♣QT542
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠52
QT96
J75
♣A973
♠Q9743
KJ42
9862
♣-
♠AK86
83
AQ3
♣KJ86
10
76
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 1 2♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS/5♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          3.00   0.00  3N S 5    6  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
  430          2.00   1.00  3N S 4    T  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
  400          0.50   2.50  3N S 3    6  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  400          0.50   2.50  3N N 3    T  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
12 ♠64
Q643
QJ643
♣A8
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠Q92
A7
AK72
♣KQT9
♠KJ75
J985
T98
♣63
♠AT83
KT2
5
♣J7542
9
185
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1 1 2♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         70    3.00   0.00  1 W 1    ♠6  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
         90    2.00   1.00  1 W 2    ♣A  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        150    1.00   2.00  1N W 3    4  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
        180    0.00   3.00  1N W 4    4  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
13 ♠4
T943
KT8
♣AT984
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠K8762
AQ
A9543
♣K
♠Q5
KJ52
Q62
♣QJ53
♠AJT93
876
J7
♣762
7
1611
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3
EW: 1♣ 3 2 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  3N E -2   ♣2  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        200    2.00   1.00  2♣ N -2   Q  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
        630    0.50   2.50  3N E 4    ♠J  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        630    0.50   2.50  3N E 4    ♠3  8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
14 ♠J9
AKJ963
J8763
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AQ6
T4
KQT2
♣T953
♠K82
8752
54
♣AQJ6
♠T7543
Q
A9
♣K8742
10
1110
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2 1NT  ♣5 ♠6
EW: 2♣  ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +100 3♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  470          3.00   0.00  2* N 2   5  8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
  420          2.00   1.00  4 N 4    ♣A  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
         50    0.00   3.00  3 N -1   5  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
15 ♠762
J942
T3
♣Q954
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AK84
Q7653
AJ5
♣K
♠5
KT8
Q7642
♣AT73
♠QJT93
A
K98
♣J862
3
179
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
EW: 2♣ 5 5 2♠ 5/4NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -460 5NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.50   0.50  2 W 3    ♠7  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
        140    2.50   0.50  2 W 3    ♠7  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        170    1.00   2.00  2 W 4    ♣4  1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        450    0.00   3.00  4 W 5    T  8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
16 ♠AK653
A82
Q6
♣J43
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠842
Q53
KJT7
♣T82
♠T9
KJ764
9542
♣A6
♠QJ7
T9
A83
♣KQ975
14
68
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          2.50   0.50  4♠ N 5    6  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
  450          2.50   0.50  4♠ N 5    ♣A  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  420          0.50   2.50  4♠ N 4    6  2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  420          0.50   2.50  4♠ N 4    6  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
17 ♠KQ5
974
K
♣KQT875
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠863
AJ52
9853
♣J2
♠AT742
KT86
72
♣63
♠J9
Q3
AQJT64
♣A94
13
67
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 2NT  ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣1 ♦1 NT1
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS/4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  520          3.00   0.00  3N N 7    ♠4  2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  420          2.00   1.00  5♣ N 6    ♠A  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  400          1.00   2.00  5♣ N 5    ♠A  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
  130          0.00   3.00  3 S 4    ♠3  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
18 ♠Q764
Q52
QJ6542
♣-
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AKJ985
K6
8
♣9875
♠T2
AT743
KT93
♣K3
♠3
J98
A7
♣AQJT642
7
1110
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2 2♠ -/2NT
       ♣6 ♦6 NT5/8
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  4♠ W -1   2  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        100    2.00   1.00  3♣ S -1   ♠A  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
        200    0.50   2.50  4♣ S -2   ♠A  2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
        200    0.50   2.50  3♣ S -2   8  9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
19 ♠7543
KJ763
765
♣J
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠QJ982
Q842
Q9
♣A9
♠AKT
T9
J84
♣QT653
♠6
A5
AKT32
♣K8742
5
1110
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1  ♠5 NT5
EW: 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦3 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  4♠ W -3   ♣J  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
  200          2.00   1.00  3♠ W -2   ♣J  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠ W -1   ♣J  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        110    0.00   3.00  2♠ E 2    K  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
20 ♠Q8764
K87
82
♣964
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T532
J95
Q64
♣K75
♠KJ9
A632
AK7
♣QJ8
♠A
QT4
JT953
♣AT32
5
618
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2 1♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  3N E -1   ♣T  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  100          2.50   0.50                4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        100    1.00   2.00  2♣ S -1   5  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
        200    0.00   3.00  2♣ S -2   ♠2  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
21 ♠A764
Q
AJ43
♣JT92
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠832
KT62
T85
♣KQ6
♠QJT95
J98
Q7
♣A85
♠K
A7543
K962
♣743
12
810
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00                4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
  110          2.00   1.00  3 N 3    Q  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
        100    0.00   3.00  2 N -1   ♠Q  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
22 ♠KQJ98
AQ9
J97
♣T5
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A753
JT5
852
♣862
♠4
8743
AKT6
♣AJ94
♠T62
K62
Q43
♣KQ73
13
512
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  2 E -2   6  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
  140          1.50   1.50  2♠ N 3    A  2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  140          1.50   1.50  1♠ N 3    A  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
         50    0.00   3.00  2♣ S -1   ♣8  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
23 ♠T4
AJ2
AT97
♣QJ64
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠983
K94
K4
♣AKT52
♠AKQ7
T7
QJ832
♣83
♠J652
Q8653
65
♣97
12
1312
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 2/3♣ 3 2/3♠ 2/3NT  ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3N W -1   ♠T  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
        120    1.50   1.50  2N E 2    5  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        120    1.50   1.50  1N E 2    6  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
        200    0.00   3.00  3N N -2   7  2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
24 ♠AT984
AK
K
♣A9642
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠J
J763
AQJ6
♣J853
♠2
T9854
T98432
♣7
♠KQ7653
Q2
75
♣KQT
18
100
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥4
EW: 3 2  ♣0 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 21 - 21 = 0
Par: +800 7*-EW-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  980          3.00   0.00  6♠ N 6    ♣7  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
  510          1.50   1.50  4♠ N 7    ♣7  2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
  510          1.50   1.50  4♠ N 7    ♣7  4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
  480          0.00   3.00  4♠ N 6    T  10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
25 ♠7
AK84
J8
♣JT9865
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠AKQ6
J7632
A94
♣K
♠982
T9
KQT7
♣A742
♠JT543
Q5
6532
♣Q3
9
179
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2/3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
EW: 4 3 4♠ 4NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    3.00   0.00  2♣ N -1   T  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        140    2.00   1.00  3♠ W 3    ♣J  8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
        600    1.00   2.00  3N E 3    ♠4  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W 4    4  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch
26 ♠T754
KQJ43
6
♣983
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠K2
T82
AT832
♣QT2
♠AJ863
975
5
♣J654
♠Q9
A6
KQJ974
♣AK7
6
96
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3 3NT  ♣6 ♠6
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N S 3    ♣T  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
  110          2.00   1.00  2 S 3    ♣T  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch
        100    1.00   2.00  4 S -1   ♣2  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        200    0.00   3.00  3 S -2   ♣2  8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
27 ♠T4
AJ76
T843
♣JT7
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠73
32
AQJ
♣Q96543
♠A982
KQ95
K5
♣AK8
♠KQJ65
T84
9762
♣2
6
919
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠5 NT1
EW: 5♣ 1 2 2♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        430    2.50   0.50  3N E 4    ♠K  3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
        430    2.50   0.50  3N E 4    ♠K  5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
        460    1.00   2.00  3N E 5    ♠K  8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
        490    0.00   3.00  3N E 6    T  6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch