Hands and Results
1 |
♠A9843
♥-
♦KQ642
♣A83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4/5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥K 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
200 1.50 1.50 3♠ N 5 ♦T 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
200 1.50 1.50 2♠ N 5 ♣J 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 4 ♦T 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
2 |
♠KQ85
♥KT9
♦932
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♦A 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
90 2.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♦T 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
80 1.00 2.00 1♥ S 1 ♥6 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
100 0.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♥2 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
3 |
♠A9632
♥K765
♦K7
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N N 1 ♣2 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 8-Hibler-Brand
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♦J 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 2-Reed-Crooch
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♣2 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
180 0.00 3.00 2N E 4 ♠J 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
|
4 |
♠-
♥76542
♦AQJT3
♣Q73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♣A 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♣3 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
5 |
♠KQ6
♥J96
♦Q42
♣J842
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2NT ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♥4 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
600 2.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♦J 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
150 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -3 ♠K 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♦9 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
6 |
♠Q7
♥QJ9876
♦3
♣A987
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♠J 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Reed-Crooch
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♠5 8-Hibler-Brand vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 ♠J 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♣Q 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
7 |
♠J865
♥5
♦KQ87
♣J953
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠5 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦K 2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 ♦K 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 ♦7 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
8 |
♠A7
♥K2
♦AKQT972
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♠ 6NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.50 0.50 6♠ S 6 ♥9 2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
980 2.50 0.50 6♠ S 6 ♥9 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
520 1.00 2.00 3N N 7 ♥J 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
400 0.00 3.00 5♦ N 5 ♥A 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
9 |
♠76
♥752
♦KQT632
♣54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 2♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
640 3.00 0.00 5♣ W 7 ♦6 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 ♥4 2-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
690 1.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♥4 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
1390 0.00 3.00 6♣ W 7 ♦K 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
10 |
♠9732
♥98
♦Q84
♣Q954
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♥6 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
100 2.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♦A 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
100 2.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♦3 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♠A 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
|
11 |
♠JT
♥A75
♦KT4
♣QT542
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♥6 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♥T 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
400 0.50 2.50 3N S 3 ♥6 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
400 0.50 2.50 3N N 3 ♥T 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
12 |
♠64
♥Q643
♦QJ643
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 3.00 0.00 1♦ W 1 ♠6 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
90 2.00 1.00 1♦ W 2 ♣A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
150 1.00 2.00 1N W 3 ♦4 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 8-Hibler-Brand
180 0.00 3.00 1N W 4 ♦4 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
13 |
♠4
♥T943
♦KT8
♣AT984
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣2 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
200 2.00 1.00 2♣ N -2 ♦Q 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♠J 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♠3 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
14 |
♠J9
♥AKJ963
♦J8763
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 3.00 0.00 2♥* N 2 ♦5 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♣A 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♦5 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
15 |
♠762
♥J942
♦T3
♣Q954
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ W 3 ♠7 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ W 3 ♠7 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 ♣4 1-Langhans-Wiegel vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♦T 8-Hibler-Brand vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
|
16 |
♠AK653
♥A82
♦Q6
♣J43
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♥6 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♣A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 ♥6 2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 ♥6 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
|
17 |
♠KQ5
♥974
♦K
♣KQT875
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 3.00 0.00 3N N 7 ♠4 2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
420 2.00 1.00 5♣ N 6 ♠A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
400 1.00 2.00 5♣ N 5 ♠A 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ S 4 ♠3 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
|
18 |
♠Q764
♥Q52
♦QJ6542
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ -/2NT ♣6 ♦6 NT5/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦2 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♠A 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 8-Hibler-Brand
200 0.50 2.50 4♣ S -2 ♠A 2-Reed-Crooch vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
200 0.50 2.50 3♣ S -2 ♦8 9-Scofield-Carlson vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
|
19 |
♠7543
♥KJ763
♦765
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♣J 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♣J 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 ♦K 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
|
20 |
♠Q8764
♥K87
♦82
♣964
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣T 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
100 2.50 0.50 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
100 1.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♥5 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
200 0.00 3.00 2♣ S -2 ♠2 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
21 |
♠A764
♥Q
♦AJ43
♣JT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N 3 ♦Q 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Oleson-Gordon
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 2-Reed-Crooch
100 0.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♠Q 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 8-Hibler-Brand
|
22 |
♠KQJ98
♥AQ9
♦J97
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 ♥6 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♦A 2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
140 1.50 1.50 1♠ N 3 ♦A 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
50 0.00 3.00 2♣ S -1 ♣8 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
|
23 |
♠T4
♥AJ2
♦AT97
♣QJ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠T 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
120 1.50 1.50 2N E 2 ♦5 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
120 1.50 1.50 1N E 2 ♦6 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦7 2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
|
24 |
♠AT984
♥AK
♦K
♣A9642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 3.00 0.00 6♠ N 6 ♣7 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
510 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 ♣7 2-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hibler-Brand
510 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 ♣7 4-Ludington-Naemura vs 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ N 6 ♦T 10-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Gille-Karbginsky
|
25 |
♠7
♥AK84
♦J8
♣JT9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2/3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♣ N -1 ♥T 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 ♣J 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
600 1.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♠4 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♥4 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|
26 |
♠T754
♥KQJ43
♦6
♣983
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♣T 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 ♣T 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch
100 1.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♣2 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
200 0.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 ♣2 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
|
27 |
♠T4
♥AJ76
♦T843
♣JT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♠K 3-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 9-Scofield-Carlson
430 2.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♠K 5-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Ludington-Naemura
460 1.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♠K 8-Hibler-Brand vs 1-Langhans-Wiegel
490 0.00 3.00 3N E 6 ♥T 6-Gille-Karbginsky vs 2-Reed-Crooch
|