Hands and Results
1 |
♠K73
♥A542
♦AQ
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 3.00 0.00 6N N 6 ♠6 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
980 2.00 1.00 6♠ N 6 ♠A 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
520 1.00 2.00 3N N 7 ♠6 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 6 ♣T 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Reed-Crooch
|
2 |
♠JT76
♥3
♦J86
♣KJ852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 2N E -3 ♠K 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
150 2.50 0.50 3♣ E -3 ♥A 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 ♦K 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ W -2 ♥3 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Reed-Crooch
|
3 |
♠8
♥J9
♦73
♣AQT96432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 ♣A 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
680 2.00 1.00 5♥ E 6 ♣K 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
1430 0.50 2.50 6♠ W 6 ♣A 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
1430 0.50 2.50 6♠ W 6 ♣A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Reed-Crooch
|
4 |
♠Q65
♥-
♦JT97642
♣KT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦1/2 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♣ W -3 ♦J 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 1-Reed-Crooch
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ N 4 ♣9 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ N 4 ♣5 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
200 0.00 3.00 5♦* N -1 ♣8 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
5 |
♠AKQ92
♥T
♦AJT9
♣A95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7/6♦ 2♥ 7/6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.00 0.00 4♥* W -5 ♠A 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
640 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 7 ♣7 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
640 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 7 ♣7 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ N 4 ♣K 1-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
|
6 |
♠K94
♥KQJ93
♦KJ9
♣Q9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣2/1 ♦7/6 ♥6/5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♦3 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
430 1.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♠5 1-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
430 1.50 1.50 3N N 4 ♦3 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 ♣T 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
|
7 |
♠432
♥AKJT86
♦94
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♥A 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♥A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♠J 1-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♥5 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
8 |
♠AJ93
♥852
♦AJ987
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♥J 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
150 2.00 1.00 2♦ N 5 ♣A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ S 4 ♥J 1-Reed-Crooch vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
130 0.50 2.50 2♦ S 4 ♥J 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
|
9 |
♠AQJ965
♥A65
♦8
♣976
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠T 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♦A 1-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♦A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ E -1 ♠3 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
10 |
♠T862
♥J97
♦AKQ
♣K32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 ♦5 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ W 4 ♦A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 4 ♦A 1-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
500 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -2 ♠A 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
11 |
♠98642
♥4
♦42
♣AQ942
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥3/5 NT3/5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 3.00 0.00 4♠* S 4 ♦Q 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♦Q 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 ♦J 1-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
100 0.00 3.00 4♠* S -1 ♥7 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
|
12 |
♠J94
♥Q9
♦76532
♣763
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2/1♣ 6/5♦ 6/5♠ 6/5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ W 5 ♣7 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 6 ♥Q 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
510 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 7 ♥Q 1-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
520 0.00 3.00 3N E 7 ♥4 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
|
13 |
♠KQ2
♥T54
♦J9854
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
930 3.00 0.00 3♠* S 4 ♥8 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ N 4 ♠3 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Reed-Crooch
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♠K 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 ♥K 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
14 |
♠83
♥KT965
♦92
♣KJ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♦7 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♠A 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Reed-Crooch
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♥6 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
300 0.00 3.00 4♥* N -2 ♠T 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
15 |
♠Q8
♥T9873
♦98753
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣J 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Reed-Crooch
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣J 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 ♣J 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 ♣J 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
16 |
♠KQ86
♥T984
♦Q
♣9876
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 ♦K 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♥A 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ E 4 ♣2 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Reed-Crooch
150 0.00 3.00 4♦ E 5 ♥A 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
17 |
♠KQ42
♥J32
♦KJ9
♣K52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣T 1-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♦7 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
100 1.00 2.00 1♣ N -2 ♦A 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ E 4 ♣Q 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
|
18 |
♠J875
♥832
♦A87
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♠3 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
660 1.00 2.00 3N S 5 ♠4 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
660 1.00 2.00 3N S 5 ♠3 1-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
660 1.00 2.00 3N S 5 ♠3 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
|
19 |
♠A87
♥KJ42
♦862
♣852
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5/4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♣* W -1 ♣2 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
50 2.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♣Q 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♣Q 1-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
100 0.50 2.50 2♠ S -2 ♣Q 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
|
20 |
♠85
♥KQ853
♦76
♣K762
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ N 6 ♦8 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 6 ♥7 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 6 ♦T 1-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
620 0.00 3.00 5♦ S 6 ♥J 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 5-Wiegel-Langhans
|
21 |
♠83
♥2
♦KJ8542
♣A962
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2♦ 2/3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 ♥2 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 5 ♣A 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Reed-Crooch
430 1.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♣3 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 ♥2 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
22 |
♠K96
♥82
♦943
♣KQ632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♦6 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Reed-Crooch
50 2.50 0.50 3♣ S -1 ♦T 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♣K 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
150 0.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♦5 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
23 |
♠5
♥QT983
♦KQ75
♣A42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4/5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣T 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 4 ♣3 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
100 0.50 2.50 5♥ S -1 ♠3 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
100 0.50 2.50 5♥ S -1 ♦A 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Reed-Crooch
|
24 |
♠A7654
♥K63
♦3
♣AKQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
360 3.00 0.00 1♠* N 3 ♦Q 2-Yung-Brockhaus vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
140 2.00 1.00 1♠ N 3 ♦Q 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 6-Scofield-Ludington
50 0.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 ♣A 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Reed-Crooch
50 0.50 2.50 3♣ W -1 ♣A 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
25 |
♠QT
♥KQ76
♦QJ75
♣652
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/5♥ 2/3♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥2/1 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♠8 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 ♦A 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Reed-Crooch
50 0.50 2.50 6♥ N -1 ♦A 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
50 0.50 2.50 6♥ N -1 ♦A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
26 |
♠J876
♥AK3
♦6
♣AKJ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N S 3 ♠5 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ N 3 ♥2 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Reed-Crooch
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ N 3 ♥2 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥6 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
27 |
♠86
♥T862
♦T8
♣J9643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♣6 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♣2 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
50 1.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♠4 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♣A 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♣A 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Reed-Crooch
|
28 |
♠98
♥K973
♦QT72
♣876
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4/5 ♠2/3 NT3/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥5 5-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Kacmarynski-Hardin
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 ♦A 6-Scofield-Ludington vs 2-Yung-Brockhaus
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♦A 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Reed-Crooch
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♦A 8-Oleson-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|