Hands and Results
1 |
♠AQ7
♥K964
♦J43
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4/5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 1♠ E 3 ♣J 4-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
140 2.50 0.50 1♠ E 3 ♣J 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Gille-French
150 1.00 2.00 1N E 3 ♣3 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 4 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
2 |
♠T6
♥A98
♦AT4
♣JT732
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♠* E -2 ♣K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 ♣9 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
200 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -2 ♠K 4-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
500 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -2 ♠K 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Gille-French
|
3 |
♠K86
♥KJ6
♦76
♣97642
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 ♦4 4-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 ♦3 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♦3 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Gille-French
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
4 |
♠Q763
♥76
♦8
♣AJ7642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠A 4-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 ♣T 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Gille-French
600 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 5 ♣T 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
750 0.00 3.00 5♦* E 5 ♥K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
5 |
♠AQT53
♥542
♦96
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣K 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 4-Reed-Crooch
300 2.00 1.00 5♣* W -2 ♠A 5-Gille-French vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
100 1.00 2.00 5♣* W -1 ♦9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ W 4 ♦9 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
|
6 |
♠7
♥AK94
♦Q76
♣AQT65
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣3 5-Gille-French vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠Q 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
150 1.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♥3 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 4 ♠A 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 4-Reed-Crooch
|
7 |
♠QT5
♥JT82
♦KT987
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣6/5 ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♦8 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
80 2.00 1.00 1♥ W 1 ♣T 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 4-Reed-Crooch
120 1.00 2.00 2N W 2 ♦T 5-Gille-French vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 ♦Q 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
|
8 |
♠Q96
♥KQ8
♦A976
♣T82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♦8 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
50 2.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 ♥K 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 4-Reed-Crooch
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 5-Gille-French vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
150 0.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♦6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
|
9 |
♠AT943
♥K982
♦-
♣J975
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT4/5 |
EW: 4♦ ♣4/3 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5♦* W -1 ♣5 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ W -1 ♥2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 ♠A 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 4-Reed-Crooch
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 ♥2 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Gille-French
|
10 |
♠A8
♥J3
♦K763
♣AKJ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -3 ♣6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
630 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♠T 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
150 0.50 2.50 3♣ N 5 ♠K 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Gille-French
150 0.50 2.50 3♣ N 5 ♠K 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 4-Reed-Crooch
|
11 |
♠5
♥Q83
♦Q532
♣QJ842
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣Q 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Gille-French
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 ♦2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 ♣Q 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 4-Reed-Crooch
140 1.00 2.00 1♠ W 3 ♥3 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
|
12 |
♠KT3
♥5
♦AK863
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4/3 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 0.00 Pass Out 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♦A 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 5-Gille-French
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♦A 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 4-Reed-Crooch
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♦A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
13 |
♠AT2
♥J9
♦K632
♣9542
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ S 3 ♣3 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
100 1.50 1.50 5♣ S -1 ♠3 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
100 1.50 1.50 5♣ S -1 ♦A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Reed-Crooch
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 ♣2 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Gille-French
|
14 |
♠AKQ8742
♥Q87
♦A7
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2/3 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 ♥9 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 ♦9 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
50 1.00 2.00 4♣ W -1 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Reed-Crooch
50 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♣2 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Gille-French
|
15 |
♠QT7
♥AQ
♦JT8
♣AKT73
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
750 3.00 0.00 3N* N 3 ♥6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Reed-Crooch
110 2.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 ♠8 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
100 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♠5 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Gille-French
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♣A 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
16 |
♠K9
♥K8543
♦972
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 ♣9 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ S 2 ♥A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Reed-Crooch
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ S 2 ♣9 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♠K 7-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Gille-French
|
17 |
♠JT62
♥T4
♦A9643
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠2 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠2 4-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♣9 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♣9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Gille-French
|
18 |
♠Q
♥9763
♦K8543
♣K82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 ♠9 4-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Gille-French
100 0.00 3.00 4♠* W -1 ♥3 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
|
19 |
♠Q6
♥T2
♦KQJ984
♣T62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♣* E -2 ♦T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Gille-French
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♦7 4-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -2 ♣9 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 ♥T 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
|
20 |
♠KJ76
♥A54
♦KJ73
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣7/6 ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N N 2 ♠4 1-Oleson-Brockhaus vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
100 2.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♥7 4-Reed-Crooch vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
100 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♦4 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♣5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Gille-French
|
21 |
♠KQ75
♥Q54
♦K92
♣965
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♥ 2/3♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♠* W -2 ♣5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ S 2 ♠2 4-Reed-Crooch vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 ♦K 5-Gille-French vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
200 0.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♠8 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
|
22 |
♠52
♥J98653
♦KQT
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
240 3.00 0.00 1N W 6 ♥5 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
660 2.00 1.00 3N W 5 ♦K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
690 1.00 2.00 3N W 6 ♥6 5-Gille-French vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
1440 0.00 3.00 6N W 6 ♦K 4-Reed-Crooch vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
23 |
♠642
♥AQ8
♦KQT96
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠2 |
EW: 1♦ 5/4♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠7 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 5-Gille-French vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 5 ♦K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 5 ♣A 4-Reed-Crooch vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
24 |
♠985
♥T96
♦AJT83
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠0 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
260 3.00 0.00 2♠ W 7 ♠5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Perchellet-Keeney
450 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 ♥T 2-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
480 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 ♣Q 4-Reed-Crooch vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
510 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 7 ♥T 5-Gille-French vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
25 |
♠J962
♥T9742
♦4
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠2 5-Gille-French vs 4-Reed-Crooch
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ E 4 ♠4 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
130 1.50 1.50 2♣ E 4 ♦8 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
200 0.00 3.00 2N S -4 ♦7 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
|
26 |
♠QT43
♥A2
♦AQ5
♣A653
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 ♠A 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
120 2.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♦3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 ♠A 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♦3 5-Gille-French vs 4-Reed-Crooch
|
27 |
♠4
♥J92
♦K6532
♣9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.00 0.00 1♠ S 1 ♣A 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 4 ♠A 5-Gille-French vs 4-Reed-Crooch
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 4 ♠A 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 ♠A 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
|
28 |
♠AKQJ632
♥986
♦Q2
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.00 0.00 6♠ N 7 ♥7 6-Perchellet-Keeney vs 2-Scofield-Kleen
710 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 ♦5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Sullivan-Hardin
710 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 ♣6 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 1-Oleson-Brockhaus
680 0.00 3.00 4♠ N 6 ♣6 5-Gille-French vs 4-Reed-Crooch
|