Hands and Results
1 |
♠Q95
♥Q643
♦QJ6
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♠3 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♠3 9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♣T 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
150 0.00 3.00 1N S 3 ♠3 10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
2 |
♠-
♥A97654
♦972
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♥2 9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♦5 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♥Q 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
|
3 |
♠KQ86
♥83
♦JT652
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 1NT ♥7/6 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♥ S 2 ♠7 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
100 2.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥8 9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♠5 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
50 0.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♣3 10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
4 |
♠KJT74
♥AK9
♦A7
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣5 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
600 2.00 1.00 3N N 3 ♦8 10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♣5 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦8 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
|
5 |
♠-
♥KQJT8
♦AT87
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.00 0.00 6♥ N 7 ♠A 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
710 1.00 2.00 5♥ N 7 ♠A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
710 1.00 2.00 4♥ N 7 ♠A 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
710 1.00 2.00 4♥ N 7 ♠A 10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
|
6 |
♠Q
♥KJ
♦854
♣AQJT543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♣ N -2 ♠A 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 ♣K 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♣8 10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
1130 0.00 3.00 3♠* E 5 ♣K 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
7 |
♠T74
♥QJ2
♦Q98764
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 3.00 0.00 3♦* N 3 ♣K 10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦K 9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 ♦T 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 ♦J 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
8 |
♠9
♥QT82
♦K97
♣AT852
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1/2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N N 2 ♣7 10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 ♠K 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
50 0.50 2.50 1N W -1 ♣5 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
50 0.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♣3 9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
|
9 |
♠A8763
♥KT
♦QT3
♣A52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♦9 9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
430 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♥3 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
430 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♣6 10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
50 0.00 3.00 5♠ N -1 ♦J 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
10 |
♠AKJ93
♥KJ
♦AJ73
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3/2♥ 5♠ 5/4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♣7 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♦T 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♣J 9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♣6 10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
|
11 |
♠J
♥T975
♦AKQ83
♣843
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠1/2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 5♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♦* S -1 ♣A 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
100 2.50 0.50 4♦* N -1 ♠9 10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 ♦A 9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
12 |
♠QT9765
♥K74
♦82
♣K8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ S 3 ♥9 9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ S 2 ♥9 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♠2 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 ♣2 10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
|
13 |
♠J2
♥A754
♦T874
♣972
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 7♦* E -1 ♥K 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♦6 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ E 5 ♥K 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
640 0.00 3.00 5♦ E 7 ♠T 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
14 |
♠98742
♥32
♦AQ8
♣JT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 2♦ S 4 ♥K 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
120 1.50 1.50 2N S 2 ♠J 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
120 1.50 1.50 1N S 2 ♣8 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
90 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 ♠K 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
|
15 |
♠JT9753
♥JT763
♦4
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2/1NT ♥3/2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♦J 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
100 1.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♣9 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
100 1.50 1.50 1♦ S -1 ♣K 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦7 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
16 |
♠T2
♥QJT62
♦J942
♣86
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♣ W 6 ♦9 9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
720 1.00 2.00 3N W 7 ♥Q 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
720 1.00 2.00 3N W 7 ♦2 10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
720 1.00 2.00 3N E 7 ♥7 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
|
17 |
♠5
♥JT863
♦T87
♣AT97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ W 4 ♥J 10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
180 2.00 1.00 1N E 4 ♠2 9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
400 1.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♣7 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♥J 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
|
18 |
♠952
♥T8
♦QT
♣AKJ752
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
150 1.50 1.50 1N W 3 ♣A 9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ W 5 ♣K 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
400 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -4 ♦2 10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
|
19 |
♠A3
♥KQ85
♦98752
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♠A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♦9 10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
100 0.50 2.50 5♠ E -1 ♥T 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ W -1 ♣3 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
|
20 |
♠5432
♥Q82
♦Q5
♣AK52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♣A 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
|
21 |
♠6543
♥JT8
♦K65
♣K73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 ♣2 4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 ♣8 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
110 1.00 2.00 1♠ S 2 ♣2 10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥5 1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
|
22 |
♠5
♥AQ52
♦764
♣J9732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N W 3 ♣3 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♠5 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♣3 10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♣2 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
23 |
♠QJ5
♥AK2
♦K73
♣A954
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N W 1 ♠Q 10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ W 3 ♥A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
150 1.00 2.00 1N W 3 ♣4 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
380 0.00 3.00 1N* W 2 ♣4 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
|
24 |
♠QJ54
♥Q876
♦A7
♣J32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ E 2 ♥J 10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥A 2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥A 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥A 7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
|
25 |
♠9853
♥T93
♦A54
♣Q94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 6N E -2 ♦3 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
200 2.50 0.50 6N E -2 ♦3 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
660 0.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♦8 10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
660 0.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♦3 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
|
26 |
♠J8
♥972
♦AK52
♣AT42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥5 ♠4 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦A 10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♦A 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ W 3 ♦K 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
140 0.50 2.50 1♠ W 3 ♦A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
|
27 |
♠86
♥J7
♦T9875
♣8653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 ♥T 10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
200 2.00 1.00 3♦ S -4 ♣A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
230 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 6 ♣J 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 ♦T 5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
|