Wednesday Evening Pairs

May 17, 2023 Game Result


? Explanation of report features   View original ACBLscore output
Download hands in PBN or PBN+ or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Field strength:  Mean: 902 MP  Geomean: 567 MP
(based on 17 players, 1 non ACBL player ignored)
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Don Brockhaus - Wing Yung 56.25 1st OA 2.19
Christy Wiegel - Victor Langhans 55.56 2nd OA 1.64
Ron Hunt - Steven Drew 53.47 3/4th OA 1.08
Hayward D (Doug) Reed - Karen Crooch 53.47 3/4th OA 1.08
EVENT>Wednesday Evening Pairs  |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>May 17, 2023       |SANCTION>L2305490B | 05/20/2023 21:54
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jerry Gordon    |RATING>Unit Championship            |MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Salem Bridge Club        
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=3                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Shain Oleson           Randall Jordan           A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     36.00  50.00          
 2 Laurie Naemura         Skip Ludington           C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     29.00  40.28          
 4 Wing Yung              Don Brockhaus            B   1     1     .   |   1     1     .     40.50  56.25  2.19(OA)
 5 Donald Pitt            Shirley Carlson          A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     33.50  46.53          
 6 Ross Hibler            B (Jeanne) Hibler        C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     31.50  43.75          
 7 Christy Wiegel         Victor Langhans          B   2     2     .   |   2     2     .     40.00  55.56  1.64(OA)
 8 Ellie Hall-Pitzer      Susan Bradford           B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     36.50  50.69          
 9 Hayward D (Doug) Reed  Karen Crooch             C  3/4    .     .   |  3/4    .     1     38.50  53.47  1.08(OA)
10 Steven Drew            Ron Hunt                 A  3/4    .     .   |  3/4    .     .     38.50  53.47  1.08(OA)
                                          Totals                                            324.00       

Hands and Results
1 ♠Q95
Q643
QJ6
♣J63
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J843
75
987
♣T972
♠T7
T82
KT532
♣AQ5
♠AK62
AKJ9
A4
♣K84
8
19
22
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3/2 5 4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          2.00   1.00  3N S 4    ♠3  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
  430          2.00   1.00  3N S 4    ♠3  9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
  430          2.00   1.00  3N S 4    ♣T  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
  150          0.00   3.00  1N S 3    ♠3  10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
2 ♠-
A97654
972
♣KJT5
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J762
Q2
K865
♣A98
♠A95
KJT8
T43
♣763
♠KQT843
3
AQJ
♣Q42
8
108
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1/2 2 3♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.50   0.50  2♠ S 3    2  9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
  140          2.50   0.50  2♠ S 3    5  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        100    0.50   2.50  4♠ S -1   Q  10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        100    0.50   2.50  3♠ S -1   Q  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
3 ♠KQ86
83
JT652
♣62
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J74
2
K9743
♣KQ53
♠52
QJT74
AQ8
♣AJ7
♠AT93
AK965
-
♣T984
6
914
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 1♣ 2 1/- 1NT
       ♥7/6 ♠5/4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  1 S 2    ♠7  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
  100          2.00   1.00  3N W -1   8  9-Reed-Crooch vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
         50    0.50   2.50  2♠ N -1   ♠5  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
         50    0.50   2.50  2 S -1   ♣3  10-Drew-Hunt vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
4 ♠KJT74
AK9
A7
♣QJ2
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠853
QT
Q43
♣T9643
♠AQ
86542
KJ982
♣5
♠962
J73
T65
♣AK87
18
410
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦5 ♥6
EW: 2 1  ♣4 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  4♠ N 4    ♣5  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
  600          2.00   1.00  3N N 3    8  10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
        100    1.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   ♣5  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
        200    0.00   3.00  3N N -2   8  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
5 ♠-
KQJT8
AT87
♣KQJ9
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ
764
9643
♣8632
♠AK6432
93
2
♣T754
♠T9875
A52
KQJ5
♣A
16
37
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 7 7 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +2000 7♠*-EW-8
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1460          3.00   0.00  6 N 7    ♠A  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
  710          1.00   2.00  5 N 7    ♠A  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
  710          1.00   2.00  4 N 7    ♠A  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
  710          1.00   2.00  4 N 7    ♠A  10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
6 ♠Q
KJ
854
♣AQJT543
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J4
96543
Q93
♣762
♠AKT752
AQ8
KJ7
♣9
♠9863
T72
AT62
♣K8
13
317
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5
EW: 1 3 4♠  ♣5 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -500 5♣*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  4♣ N -2   ♠A  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        140    2.00   1.00  3♠ E 3    ♣K  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
        650    1.00   2.00  4♠ E 5    ♣8  10-Drew-Hunt vs 9-Reed-Crooch
       1130    0.00   3.00  3♠* E 5   ♣K  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
7 ♠T74
QJ2
Q98764
♣A
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AKJ
A97
2
♣T87632
♠Q9853
T43
A53
♣K4
♠62
K865
KJT
♣QJ95
9
129
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦4 ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  670          3.00   0.00  3* N 3   ♣K  10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
  200          2.00   1.00  4♠ E -2   K  9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ E 3    T  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ E 4    J  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
8 ♠9
QT82
K97
♣AT852
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A632
AKJ3
2
♣QJ64
♠KJ4
9764
J8653
♣7
♠QT875
5
AQT4
♣K93
9
155
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 1♠ 2NT  ♥5
EW: 1/2  ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +100 3*-W-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00  2N N 2    ♣7  10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
  110          2.00   1.00  3♣ N 3    ♠K  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
   50          0.50   2.50  1N W -1   ♣5  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
   50          0.50   2.50  3 E -1   ♣3  9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
9 ♠A8763
KT
QT3
♣A52
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KJ2
5
A9872
♣T743
♠T5
J6432
J54
♣J86
♠Q94
AQ987
K6
♣KQ9
13
83
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 4 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          2.00   1.00  3N S 4    9  9-Reed-Crooch vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
  430          2.00   1.00  3N N 4    3  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
  430          2.00   1.00  3N N 4    ♣6  10-Drew-Hunt vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
         50    0.00   3.00  5♠ N -1   J  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
10 ♠AKJ93
KJ
AJ73
♣K9
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠764
763
865
♣Q842
♠85
AQT4
T9
♣JT765
♠QT2
9852
KQ42
♣A3
20
27
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 3/2 5♠ 5/4NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +660 5NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          3.00   0.00  3N N 6    ♣7  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ N 5    T  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ N 5    ♣J  9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
  650          1.00   2.00  4♠ N 5    ♣6  10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
11 ♠J
T975
AKQ83
♣843
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠Q8765
AJ
J765
♣A5
♠KT932
Q643
-
♣JT96
♠A4
K82
T942
♣KQ72
10
126
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣5 ♥6 ♠1/2 NT6
EW: 1♣ 5♠  ♦4 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.50   0.50  4* S -1  ♣A  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        100    2.50   0.50  4* N -1  ♠9  10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
        420    1.00   2.00  4♠ W 4    A  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        450    0.00   3.00  4♠ W 5    A  9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
12 ♠QT9765
K74
82
♣K8
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AJ4
QT9
KQ54
♣A95
♠K832
J82
T6
♣T632
♠-
A653
AJ973
♣QJ74
8
164
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2/3 2 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +110 2-NS/3-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  3 S 3    9  9-Reed-Crooch vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
   90          2.00   1.00  2♣ S 2    9  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        100    1.00   2.00  2 N -1   ♠2  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        200    0.00   3.00  3♠ N -2   ♣2  10-Drew-Hunt vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
13 ♠J2
A754
T874
♣972
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠863
J3
6
♣AKQT853
♠A954
8
AKQJ952
♣6
♠KQT7
KQT962
3
♣J4
5
1014
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣0 ♦0 ♠3 NT0
EW: 6♣ 4 2♠ 1NT  ♥4
LoTT: 21 - 18 = +3
Par: -800 6*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  7* E -1  K  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -1   6  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
        150    1.00   2.00  4 E 5    K  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
        640    0.00   3.00  5 E 7    ♠T  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
14 ♠98742
32
AQ8
♣JT5
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠KQJ3
KQ54
J5
♣862
♠T65
AT8
T642
♣K74
♠A
J976
K973
♣AQ93
7
127
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 2 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          3.00   0.00  2 S 4    K  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
  120          1.50   1.50  2N S 2    ♠J  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
  120          1.50   1.50  1N S 2    ♣8  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
   90          0.00   3.00  2 S 2    ♠K  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
15 ♠JT9753
JT763
4
♣7
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠K8
94
JT876
♣KQT9
♠A64
K85
Q93
♣J864
♠Q2
AQ2
AK52
♣A532
2
910
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 5♠  ♣5 ♦5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2/1NT  ♥3/2 ♠2
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +500 5NT*-E-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          3.00   0.00  4♠ S 5    J  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        100    1.50   1.50  3N S -1   ♣9  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
        100    1.50   1.50  1 S -1   ♣K  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 9-Reed-Crooch
        200    0.00   3.00  3N S -2   7  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
16 ♠T2
QJT62
J942
♣86
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K93
7
AQ
♣AJT7542
♠A876
A543
T83
♣K9
♠QJ54
K98
K765
♣Q3
4
1411
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT1
EW: 6♣ 1 1 4♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.00   0.00  3♣ W 6    9  9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        720    1.00   2.00  3N W 7    Q  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        720    1.00   2.00  3N W 7    2  10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        720    1.00   2.00  3N E 7    7  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
17 ♠5
JT863
T87
♣AT97
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠JT83
52
KJ
♣J8543
♠Q974
AK97
A93
♣KQ
♠AK62
Q4
Q6542
♣62
5
618
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1 1 4♠ 2NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.00   0.00  3♠ W 4    J  10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        180    2.00   1.00  1N E 4    ♠2  9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        400    1.00   2.00  3N W 3    ♣7  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        420    0.00   3.00  4♠ W 4    J  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
18 ♠952
T8
QT
♣AKJ752
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K63
A5
K732
♣QT64
♠J84
QJ93
A9854
♣3
♠AQT7
K7642
J6
♣98
10
128
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦2 ♥6 NT5
EW: 4 2NT  ♣5 ♥6 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -130 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  2♠ N -1   A  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        150    1.50   1.50  1N W 3    ♣A  9-Reed-Crooch vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        150    1.50   1.50  3 W 5    ♣K  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        400    0.00   3.00  3♠ S -4   2  10-Drew-Hunt vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
19 ♠A3
KQ85
98752
♣Q3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠Q7
J9432
AQJT
♣A7
♠KJ962
A76
-
♣KJ862
♠T854
T
K643
♣T954
11
1412
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 3 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 17 = -3
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.50   0.50  4 W -2   ♠A  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
  200          2.50   0.50  4 W -2   9  10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
  100          0.50   2.50  5♠ E -1   T  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
  100          0.50   2.50  4 W -1   ♣3  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
20 ♠5432
Q82
Q5
♣AK52
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KJT97
765
A3
♣QJ3
♠Q8
KT93
KT87
♣T87
♠A6
AJ4
J9642
♣964
11
118
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1/-  ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♠  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  2♠ W -1   ♣A  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
    PASS       1.00   2.00  Pass Out      10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
21 ♠6543
JT8
K65
♣K73
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠T
Q76532
QJT
♣842
♠A87
AK
942
♣QJ965
♠KQJ92
94
A873
♣AT
7
514
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠ 2NT  ♣4 ♥4
EW: 1♣ 2  ♦4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  2♠ S 4    ♣2  4-Yung-Brockhaus vs 9-Reed-Crooch
  140          2.00   1.00  2♠ S 3    ♣8  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
  110          1.00   2.00  1♠ S 2    ♣2  10-Drew-Hunt vs 5-Pitt-Carlson
        100    0.00   3.00  4♠ S -1   5  1-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
22 ♠5
AQ52
764
♣J9732
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AKQJ6
K8
KQ953
♣K
♠872
JT764
2
♣AQ85
♠T943
93
AJT8
♣T64
7
217
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4
EW: 1♣ 1/2 3 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        600    3.00   0.00  3N W 3    ♣3  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
        620    1.00   2.00  4♠ W 4    ♠5  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        620    1.00   2.00  4♠ W 4    ♣3  10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        620    1.00   2.00  4♠ W 4    ♣2  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
23 ♠QJ5
AK2
K73
♣A954
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AK3
98
AJT65
♣KJ8
♠984
QT65
Q4
♣QT72
♠T762
J743
982
♣63
17
166
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5
EW: 2♣ 2 1 2NT  ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    3.00   0.00  1N W 1    ♠Q  10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        110    2.00   1.00  2 W 3    A  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
        150    1.00   2.00  1N W 3    ♣4  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        380    0.00   3.00  1N* W 2   ♣4  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
24 ♠QJ54
Q876
A7
♣J32
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A
T532
K954
♣KT75
♠KT9732
9
QT2
♣AQ9
♠86
AKJ4
J863
♣864
10
1011
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 3♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    3.00   0.00  2♠ E 2    J  10-Drew-Hunt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ E 3    A  2-Naemura-Ludington vs 8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ E 3    A  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ E 3    A  7-Wiegel-Langhans vs 9-Reed-Crooch
25 ♠9853
T93
A54
♣Q94
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A
AQJ6
JT92
♣KJ85
♠KQT6
K74
K6
♣A732
♠J742
852
Q873
♣T6
6
1615
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2
EW: 5♣ 5 5 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.50   0.50  6N E -2   3  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
  200          2.50   0.50  6N E -2   3  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
        660    0.50   2.50  3N E 5    8  10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        660    0.50   2.50  3N E 5    3  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
26 ♠J8
972
AK52
♣AT42
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AQ964
KQJ5
QJ9
♣3
♠T53
A64
763
♣Q876
♠K72
T83
T84
♣KJ95
12
156
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 -/1NT
       ♥5 ♠4 NT6/7
EW: 1 3♠  ♣6 ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠ W -2   A  10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        110    2.00   1.00  2♠ W 2    A  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus
        140    0.50   2.50  3♠ W 3    K  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        140    0.50   2.50  1♠ W 3    A  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
27 ♠86
J7
T9875
♣8653
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KJT9
AQ82
AQ4
♣A9
♠Q743
543
32
♣KQ74
♠A52
KT96
KJ6
♣JT2
1
207
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 4 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.00   0.00  2♠ E 4    T  10-Drew-Hunt vs 7-Wiegel-Langhans
        200    2.00   1.00  3 S -4   ♣A  6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Naemura-Ludington
        230    1.00   2.00  3♠ E 6    ♣J  8-Hall-Pitzer-Bradford vs 1-Oleson-Jordan
        450    0.00   3.00  4♠ W 5    T  5-Pitt-Carlson vs 4-Yung-Brockhaus