Hands and Results
1 |
♠KJT3
♥6
♦9875
♣T984
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5/6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 ♥9 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♦K 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 2 ♥2 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
2 |
♠KJ
♥K64
♦K75
♣QJ542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠2 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 ♣5 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 ♥4 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 ♣Q 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
3 |
♠J3
♥854
♦AT743
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 ♥8 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 5 ♥8 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
4 |
♠KJT
♥742
♦AK753
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
5 |
♠43
♥5
♦K9865
♣AT763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 2♦ S 4 ♥J 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
120 1.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♠5 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
300 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -3 ♠7 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
|
6 |
♠K865
♥42
♦42
♣Q9752
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 5 ♦T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 ♦T 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♦T 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
|
7 |
♠K96
♥-
♦Q98
♣KJT9853
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ -/2NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5/8 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ ♣3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣J 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
130 0.50 1.50 4♣ N 4 ♠J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
130 0.50 1.50 2♣ S 4 ♦A 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
|
8 |
♠AKT84
♥4
♦A9652
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣5/6 ♥3/4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠9 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥4 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♦T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
|
9 |
♠AKQJT9
♥K5
♦KQ3
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 5♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1520 2.00 0.00 7N S 7 ♠6 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
1020 0.50 1.50 6N N 7 ♥T 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
1020 0.50 1.50 6N N 7 ♥6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
10 |
♠QJ65
♥A83
♦J9
♣AQJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 5♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 2.00 0.00 5♦* W -4 ♠Q 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♦A 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
|
11 |
♠KT94
♥764
♦QT
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
50 0.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♠3 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
50 0.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 ♣K 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
12 |
♠653
♥6532
♦J63
♣AT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N W 3 ♦3 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
460 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 ♠6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
460 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 ♥6 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
13 |
♠Q5
♥QT9853
♦5
♣A842
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣4/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ E 3 ♠A 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ E 3 ♠A 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
|
14 |
♠KT9
♥Q9
♦AKQ93
♣Q52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 2.00 0.00 6N S 6 ♠2 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
490 1.00 1.00 3N S 6 ♠2 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
50 0.00 2.00 6N S -1 ♠2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
|
15 |
♠AQ
♥A8
♦Q974
♣KJT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 2 ♣7 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
300 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -3 ♦A 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
|
16 |
♠7654
♥T8653
♦T2
♣32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♦3 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
630 1.00 1.00 3N W 4 ♥5 7-Perchellet-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
660 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♠7 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
|
17 |
♠A
♥AJT8
♦AJ74
♣KQJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N 2 ♠6 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
110 1.00 1.00 1♦ N 3 ♠K 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♣2 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
|
18 |
♠JT7
♥J643
♦Q3
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ W 5 ♣K 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
200 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 5 ♣K 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♣K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
19 |
♠AT85432
♥3
♦K96
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 1.50 0.50 6♠ N 7 ♦4 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
1010 1.50 0.50 6♠ N 7 ♣4 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
510 0.00 2.00 4♠ N 7 ♣3 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
20 |
♠AQJT
♥96
♦KJ95
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 3 ♠3 3-Ludington-Naemura vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
170 1.00 1.00 1♥ E 4 ♦8 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♦4 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
|
21 |
♠-
♥9742
♦KJ852
♣KJ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥2 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 ♦8 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♥9 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
22 |
♠KQ97
♥AQ9
♦A8
♣K872
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ 2/1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦7 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 1 ♦K 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
180 0.00 2.00 2♦* E 2 ♥8 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
|
23 |
♠JT9
♥-
♦J762
♣AKT642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♦5 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♣5 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 ♦3 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
|
24 |
♠AJ2
♥AT986
♦Q652
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥3 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣T 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 6-Sullivan-Hardin
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 4 ♥A 4-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Ludington-Naemura
|
25 |
♠84
♥AJ8654
♦K94
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♦J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♠5 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣Q 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
|
26 |
♠KJ73
♥832
♦KT32
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♣K 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 ♠3 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♠4 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
|
27 |
♠AJ63
♥K64
♦QJ32
♣K8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 ♣J 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♣J 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣J 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
|
28 |
♠Q5
♥KQT6
♦AT7
♣J764
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 5 ♥9 8-Kacmarynski-Hunt vs 7-Perchellet-Keeney
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 ♦3 6-Sullivan-Hardin vs 2-Pitt-Hall-Pitzer
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♣9 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Scofield-Kleen
|