Hands and Results
1 |
♠753
♥732
♦KJ73
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦9 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
400 2.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦2 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
490 0.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♥4 8-Hunt-Diess vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
490 0.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♥3 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
2 |
♠A
♥AKT98632
♦5
♣T65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4/5 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3/-NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT9/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -4 ♠3 8-Hunt-Diess vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♦Q 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 ♦8 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
|
3 |
♠JT97
♥K96
♦AKJ5
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 ♥T 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 ♥2 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥2 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
150 0.00 3.00 1N E 3 ♠3 8-Hunt-Diess vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
|
4 |
♠Q743
♥T7
♦JT972
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.17 0.83 1N W 1 ♦J 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
90 2.17 0.83 2♦ E 2 ♠J 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
630 0.17 2.83 3N W 4 ♦J 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
5 |
♠A84
♥KJ872
♦T3
♣K84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥4 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♦T 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥4 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 ♥4 8-Hunt-Diess vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
6 |
♠T84
♥53
♦QT976
♣K63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 1N N -1 ♥7 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
50 2.50 0.50 1♠ S -1 ♣T 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
170 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 4 ♠6 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.50 2.50 1♥ E 4 ♣9 8-Hunt-Diess vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
7 |
♠5
♥QT876
♦9543
♣943
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N W 4 ♠5 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
300 2.00 1.00 2♥ N -3 ♣Q 8-Hunt-Diess vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
600 1.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♠5 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♠5 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
|
8 |
♠KQ653
♥Q9
♦A654
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♠T 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♣2 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♦Q 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥4 8-Hunt-Diess vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
9 |
♠AT2
♥T6
♦T83
♣AK954
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣J 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 ♠Q 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 ♠5 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠Q 8-Hunt-Diess vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
|
10 |
♠AT865
♥K9432
♦75
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♦8 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♣7 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
600 1.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♦8 8-Hunt-Diess vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ N 2 ♦6 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
|
11 |
♠762
♥643
♦J74
♣QT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N E 5 ♥5 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
480 2.00 1.00 5♠ W 6 ♣2 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
490 1.00 2.00 3N W 6 ♥6 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
980 0.00 3.00 6♠ W 6 ♣T 8-Hunt-Diess vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
|
12 |
♠AQ3
♥8
♦J98753
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♣4 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
120 2.00 1.00 2N S 2 ♥5 8-Hunt-Diess vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥5 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♥5 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
13 |
♠A4
♥Q762
♦A82
♣7643
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 1N* W -2 ♣7 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
150 2.00 1.00 1N S 3 ♠Q 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
110 1.00 2.00 2♣ S 3 ♠Q 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ S 2 ♥A 8-Hunt-Diess vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
|
14 |
♠AJ96
♥965
♦K
♣T9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♦K 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ S 4 ♥Q 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ S 4 ♥Q 8-Hunt-Diess vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ S 3 ♦7 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
15 |
♠KQ64
♥85
♦KT65
♣Q98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♥8 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
100 1.50 1.50 2N W -2 ♠6 8-Hunt-Diess vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
100 1.50 1.50 2♦ E -2 ♠3 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♠K 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
|
16 |
♠7642
♥953
♦Q93
♣A98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.50 0.50 3N W 5 ♥9 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
660 2.50 0.50 3N W 5 ♦9 8-Hunt-Diess vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
690 0.50 2.50 3N W 6 ♠2 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
690 0.50 2.50 3N W 6 ♠2 7-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
17 |
♠T94
♥Q92
♦AT5
♣8642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♥* S -2 ♣K 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
400 1.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♥5 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
400 1.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♥5 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
460 0.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♥6 8-Hunt-Diess vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
18 |
♠KQ
♥J762
♦AT842
♣KQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣K 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣K 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♥2 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
300 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -3 ♠T 8-Hunt-Diess vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
|
19 |
♠95
♥AT986
♦Q6
♣A864
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 0.00 Pass Out 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♠A 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W 3 ♥T 8-Hunt-Diess vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W 3 ♦6 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
20 |
♠643
♥AQ82
♦KQ73
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♣2 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
90 2.00 1.00 1N E 1 ♥4 1-Naemura-Ludington vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
120 1.00 2.00 1N E 2 ♣4 8-Hunt-Diess vs 5-Yung-Brockhaus
150 0.00 3.00 1N E 3 ♠5 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
21 |
♠KQT4
♥732
♦JT93
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2/1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 1.00 5♥ S 6 ♠7 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
680 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 ♦6 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
680 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 ♣4 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
600 0.00 3.00 3N S 3 ♠5 8-Hunt-Diess vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
|
22 |
♠A2
♥AT864
♦9832
♣T3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 1♥ ♦6/7 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 1♠ N 3 ♣K 8-Hunt-Diess vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ E 2 ♣K 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
110 1.50 1.50 1♠ E 2 ♣K 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
140 0.00 3.00 1♠ E 3 ♣K 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
|
23 |
♠T8
♥T7
♦AT953
♣J862
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♠T 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 ♣A 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ S 3 ♣A 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣A 8-Hunt-Diess vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
|
24 |
♠652
♥8542
♦82
♣T864
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 3/2♠ 1/-NT ♦6/5 ♥5/4 NT7/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -2 ♣A 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
100 1.50 1.50 3♦ N -2 ♥J 4-Pitt-Gordon vs 3-Wiegel-Langhans
100 1.50 1.50 1♦ S -2 ♥3 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
100 1.50 1.50 2♣ S -2 ♥3 8-Hunt-Diess vs 6-Scofield-Wiegel
|
25 |
♠AT3
♥KQ8
♦AT8543
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ N 4 ♣A 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♣7 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♦6 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
200 0.00 3.00 4♦** N -1 ♣A 8-Hunt-Diess vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
26 |
♠Q62
♥K765
♦J953
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3/4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4/5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠5 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
600 1.50 1.50 3N W 3 ♥7 8-Hunt-Diess vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
600 1.50 1.50 3N W 3 ♥5 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♥5 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
27 |
♠KJ972
♥-
♦AQ93
♣K732
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 3.00 0.00 6♦ S 6 ♥Q 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♦8 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 ♣5 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
460 0.00 3.00 3N S 5 ♥T 8-Hunt-Diess vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|
28 |
♠AQT52
♥75
♦32
♣KQJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4/5♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥4 3-Wiegel-Langhans vs 1-Naemura-Ludington
100 2.00 1.00 5♥ W -2 ♣K 5-Yung-Brockhaus vs 4-Pitt-Gordon
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣K 6-Scofield-Wiegel vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 ♣K 8-Hunt-Diess vs 7-Hibler-Hibler
|