Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠973
♥K432
♦Q85
♣K98
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♥T 5-Yung-Pitt vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
50 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥6 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
150 0.00 2.00 1N E 3 ♥T 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Gille-Naemura
|
| 2 |
♠Q874
♥Q743
♦J8
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♦K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♦K 5-Yung-Pitt vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦K 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Gille-Naemura
|
| 3 |
♠K
♥JT92
♦T932
♣QT72
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4/5 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥J 5-Yung-Pitt vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
150 1.00 1.00 2N W 3 ♥J 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Gille-Naemura
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♠K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
|
| 4 |
♠KJT
♥-
♦AKQ5
♣KQT852
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣1 ♦6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 5♣ N 6 ♥A 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Gille-Naemura
170 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 6 ♠Q 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥K 5-Yung-Pitt vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
|
| 5 |
♠AT84
♥K965
♦K85
♣84
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 2 ♦Q 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 2-Gille-Naemura
80 1.00 1.00 1♥ N 1 ♠Q 5-Yung-Pitt vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
|
| 6 |
♠Q2
♥AJ
♦KT832
♣QJ95
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3N S -2 ♥6 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Yung-Pitt
100 1.50 0.50 3N S -2 ♥6 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 2-Gille-Naemura
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♥T 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
|
| 7 |
♠Q92
♥AJ52
♦J84
♣K72
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠2 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 2-Gille-Naemura
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦J 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦4 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Yung-Pitt
|
| 8 |
♠Q82
♥T87
♦A763
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♦3 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 2-Gille-Naemura
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♦3 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Yung-Pitt
120 0.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♦3 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
|
| 9 |
♠63
♥KJT874
♦QJ6
♣85
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♠6 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 2-Gille-Naemura
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♣6 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Yung-Pitt
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♣6 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
|
| 10 |
♠KQ54
♥A87654
♦J
♣J7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣0 ♦0 NT0 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 4♦ E 6 ♥Q 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 5-Yung-Pitt
190 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 7 ♣5 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 2-Gille-Naemura
|
| 11 |
♠K9743
♥KJ
♦T
♣KQ832
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♦ -/1♥ 1/2♠ 2NT
♣6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ W 2 ♣K 2-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 3 ♣K 5-Yung-Pitt vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 3 ♣K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
|
| 12 |
♠KT7
♥AK754
♦J7
♣A93
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♠4/3 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♦K 2-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 ♦K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 ♣8 5-Yung-Pitt vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 13 |
♠AKJ976
♥K5
♦KT6
♣T7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 4 ♥9 5-Yung-Pitt vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N 4 ♥9 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♥9 2-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
|
| 14 |
♠5
♥J4
♦86542
♣AQT98
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N S 4 ♥7 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ S 4 ♠2 5-Yung-Pitt vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
50 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥7 2-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
|
| 15 |
♠QJ842
♥T
♦T53
♣KJT3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♦ E -3 ♥A 2-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 ♦K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 3-Gordon-Oleson
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 2 ♦7 5-Yung-Pitt vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 16 |
♠AK8
♥Q65
♦AKQJ3
♣K2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♠6 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
460 1.00 1.00 5N S 5 ♥A 2-Gille-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Pitt
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ S 5 ♥A 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 17 |
♠642
♥T76
♦AT864
♣92
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦Q 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♠2 2-Gille-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Pitt
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♦Q 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 18 |
♠JT
♥AQT4
♦K75
♣AJT6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥9 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♣K 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 4 ♣K 2-Gille-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Pitt
|
| 19 |
♠QJ654
♥A94
♦Q3
♣K98
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♥7 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
460 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♥2 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
400 0.00 2.00 5♦ S 5 ♥K 2-Gille-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Pitt
|
| 20 |
♠A
♥T932
♦K5
♣KQ8652
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♦J 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 1-Wiegel-Langhans
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 ♠5 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
600 0.00 2.00 5♣ N 5 ♦4 2-Gille-Naemura vs 5-Yung-Pitt
|
| 21 |
♠KJT753
♥82
♦K3
♣763
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 4 ♦2 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 2-Gille-Naemura
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♣9 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ S 3 ♣Q 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Pitt
|
| 22 |
♠K
♥QJT
♦AQT95
♣K982
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♥7/6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥5/6 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -4 ♠K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Pitt
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 ♥9 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
50 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♣A 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 2-Gille-Naemura
|
| 23 |
♠T9732
♥JT
♦KT8
♣876
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥4 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Pitt
200 1.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♥4 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 2-Gille-Naemura
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥J 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 24 |
♠J84
♥A98542
♦T
♣Q95
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♦9 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 2-Gille-Naemura
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 ♥K 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Pitt
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥K 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
| 25 |
♠KJT87643
♥7
♦T98
♣6
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♠ ♣0 ♦4 ♥0 NT1 |
| EW: 7♣ 3♦ 7♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣A 3-Gordon-Oleson vs 2-Gille-Naemura
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 5 ♥2 6-Ludington-Keeney vs 5-Yung-Pitt
100 0.00 2.00 5♠ N -2 ♥T 1-Wiegel-Langhans vs 4-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
