Hands and Results
1 |
♠AT53
♥62
♦A983
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1/2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 2 ♦J 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 5-Gille-Naemura
110 1.00 1.00 1♥ E 2 ♦J 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 ♥6 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
2 |
♠T93
♥AJ642
♦43
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♦K 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 5-Gille-Naemura
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♥9 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♣5 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
3 |
♠AT
♥J3
♦KJT95432
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 5♦ N 5 ♥A 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 5-Gille-Naemura
150 0.50 1.50 4♦ N 5 ♥A 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
150 0.50 1.50 4♦ N 5 ♥A 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
4 |
♠AJ764
♥AT6
♦K93
♣75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♥2 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 5-Gille-Naemura
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♦8 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♦8 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
5 |
♠KT965
♥QJ86
♦QT4
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦5 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦5 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦5 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
|
6 |
♠AJT732
♥32
♦4
♣AJ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♣ N 4 ♦A 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
50 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥8 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
90 0.00 2.00 1N E 1 ♥A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
7 |
♠-
♥AJ5
♦KJ953
♣A8764
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1/2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♦2 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ S 5 ♠A 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 ♥T 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
8 |
♠A986
♥KQ6
♦T94
♣K85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N W 3 ♣5 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
430 0.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♠2 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
430 0.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥5 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
|
9 |
♠T8732
♥975
♦97
♣QJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0/1 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 1.50 0.50 3N E 6 ♥J 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Gille-Naemura
690 1.50 0.50 3N E 6 ♥J 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
720 0.00 2.00 3N E 7 ♣3 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
10 |
♠J52
♥AJ3
♦QT942
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3/2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦4 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
600 0.50 1.50 3N W 3 ♦9 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Gille-Naemura
600 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♣5 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
11 |
♠T642
♥KQ932
♦72
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 ♥A 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♦T 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Gille-Naemura
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
12 |
♠A62
♥543
♦K942
♣JT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♦J 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
170 1.50 0.50 1♥ S 4 ♦J 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♦J 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 5-Gille-Naemura
|
13 |
♠95
♥QJ54
♦J753
♣KT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♠6 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Gille-Naemura
660 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 ♠J 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
660 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 ♠T 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
|
14 |
♠K4
♥KQ943
♦QJ
♣Q764
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♠A 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Gille-Naemura
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♥7 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
100 0.00 2.00 1N S -2 ♠2 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
|
15 |
♠Q7
♥A832
♦J97
♣Q854
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♥T 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♦6 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♦6 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Gille-Naemura
|
16 |
♠8743
♥KQ52
♦2
♣AK52
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ S -2 ♠A 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer vs 5-Gille-Naemura
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 ♦2 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 4 ♣A 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
|
17 |
♠AT2
♥K97
♦AKQJ5
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N N 4 ♥J 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ N 5 ♣K 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣K 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
18 |
♠KJ8
♥KJ94
♦J54
♣Q87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5/6♦ 2♥ 1♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♠2 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
660 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♥T 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
600 0.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♥T 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
19 |
♠92
♥QT
♦AT7
♣AQJ862
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♠6 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♦5 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 ♦2 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
20 |
♠KQJ9752
♥JT8
♦K
♣J2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♦Q 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 ♠K 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski vs 6-Canoy-Canoy
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♦3 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|
21 |
♠KQ6
♥T53
♦987
♣AT62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♦9 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
100 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♥7 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♥7 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
|
22 |
♠AQ86
♥QJ
♦JT2
♣QT72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 2 ♣9 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 3 ♦4 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 3 ♣3 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
|
23 |
♠KQ7543
♥JT72
♦J3
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♣3 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
660 1.00 1.00 3N W 5 ♠5 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
690 0.00 2.00 3N W 6 ♠5 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
|
24 |
♠KJ73
♥K43
♦QT
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2/3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1♥ W -1 ♣Q 2-Oleson-Jordan vs 7-Scofield-Hall-Pitzer
80 1.00 1.00 1♥ W 1 ♣Q 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Pitt-Carlson
110 0.00 2.00 1♥ W 2 ♣Q 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
|
25 |
♠K32
♥AKQ9854
♦K
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 2.00 0.00 6♥ N 7 ♠J 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
510 0.50 1.50 4♥ N 7 ♠J 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
510 0.50 1.50 4♥ N 7 ♠J 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
26 |
♠KT93
♥J985
♦Q952
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 4♣ E 6 ♠3 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
620 1.00 1.00 5♣ W 6 ♦2 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
1370 0.00 2.00 6♣ W 6 ♠K 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
27 |
♠2
♥AJ9653
♦7
♣KQJ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 7♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3/2 ♦5/4 ♥0 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.00 0.00 6♥ N 6 ♥2 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
480 0.50 1.50 5♥ N 6 ♥2 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
480 0.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 ♣2 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
28 |
♠85
♥T63
♦J8632
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 5N E -3 ♥5 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♥5 3-Pitt-Carlson vs 1-Brockhaus-Kacmarynski
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♣4 6-Canoy-Canoy vs 2-Oleson-Jordan
|