Hands and Results
1 |
♠987
♥KQ6
♦6
♣KQ9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ ♦4/5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Gille-Naemura
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 1-Crooch-Reed
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 ♥K 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♥K 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
2 |
♠KT983
♥-
♦JT52
♣QT64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♥* E -2 ♣3 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Gille-Naemura
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 ♦4 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 ♣3 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♥J 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
3 |
♠A983
♥AT6
♦T84
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦4/5 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 2 ♦A 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
110 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 2 ♦A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 1-Crooch-Reed
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Gille-Naemura
210 0.00 3.00 1N W 5 ♠3 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
4 |
♠KQ73
♥95
♦KQ432
♣K4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣1/2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -4 ♦A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 1-Crooch-Reed
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ N -1 ♣A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 5-Gille-Naemura
200 1.00 2.00 5♦* N -1 ♣A 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
910 0.00 3.00 4♣* E 5 ♦K 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
5 |
♠Q85
♥A2
♦QT3
♣KQJ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 ♣T 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 ♣2 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ W 5 ♣K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 ♣K 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
6 |
♠Q3
♥AT
♦842
♣QJ9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥A 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♣T 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 ♦J 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 4 ♦A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
7 |
♠JT4
♥K5
♦J72
♣QT852
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣5 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
120 1.50 1.50 2N W 2 ♣5 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
120 1.50 1.50 1N W 2 ♠J 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 ♦A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
8 |
♠A873
♥96
♦T985
♣T83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 2NT ♣2 ♦6/5 ♥2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ E 5 ♦A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♠K 1-Crooch-Reed vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♠K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
9 |
♠K95
♥A74
♦AJT83
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♦2 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♦5 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Gille-Naemura
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♦A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
100 0.00 3.00 1N S -2 ♥2 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
10 |
♠J73
♥QT987
♦A75
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥4 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Gille-Naemura
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♣5 1-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
500 0.00 3.00 3♥* N -2 ♣5 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
11 |
♠AJ96
♥KJ65
♦94
♣865
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4/5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6N E -2 ♦6 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
50 2.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥T 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
400 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥T 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Gille-Naemura
400 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♣5 1-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
|
12 |
♠97
♥54
♦KJ743
♣T984
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥2/3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ W 2 ♦4 1-Crooch-Reed vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 4 ♥5 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Gille-Naemura
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 5 ♣T 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♣T 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
13 |
♠KT
♥52
♦AT8764
♣A85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 5/3♦ 5/3♥ 2NT ♣7/6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♠6 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
600 2.50 0.50 5♦ N 5 ♠A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ N 4 ♠A 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Crooch-Reed
130 0.50 2.50 2♦ N 4 ♠A 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 5-Gille-Naemura
|
14 |
♠J984
♥KJ6
♦T82
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♦9 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Crooch-Reed
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 5-Gille-Naemura
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
15 |
♠732
♥982
♦AJ
♣AQT92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Crooch-Reed
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦9 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 ♦A 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 5-Gille-Naemura
|
16 |
♠KQJ95
♥9
♦Q94
♣QT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠K 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ W 4 ♠K 7-Carlson-Pitt vs 5-Gille-Naemura
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 ♣2 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Crooch-Reed
150 0.00 3.00 1N W 3 ♠K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
|
17 |
♠AKQ4
♥42
♦AJ9754
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♠7 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 5-Gille-Naemura
430 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♠8 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
400 1.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♦2 1-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
50 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥3 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
|
18 |
♠J542
♥T7
♦AQ764
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦6 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
50 2.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♦6 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♦2 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 5-Gille-Naemura
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♦A 1-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
19 |
♠432
♥KT764
♦8
♣KJT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4/5 ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♣7 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
100 1.50 1.50 2N S -2 ♠K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 5-Gille-Naemura
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -2 ♠K 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♦8 1-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
20 |
♠KQ854
♥A2
♦8
♣KQJ62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥J 1-Crooch-Reed vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ N 4 ♥J 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ N 4 ♥J 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♠J 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 5-Gille-Naemura
|
21 |
♠K98
♥A42
♦AT7
♣Q865
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♠K 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
100 1.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♦2 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♦K 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Crooch-Reed
200 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -2 ♥J 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
|
22 |
♠AK2
♥K6
♦AKQ6
♣9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 4N N 5 ♦3 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
460 2.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♥4 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
430 1.00 2.00 3N N 4 ♦3 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Crooch-Reed
50 0.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♣2 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
|
23 |
♠A8743
♥J963
♦AK
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♣5 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Crooch-Reed
630 1.50 1.50 3N S 4 ♠Q 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
630 1.50 1.50 3N S 4 ♦3 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
600 0.00 3.00 3N S 3 ♥2 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
|
24 |
♠85
♥97
♦AT5
♣AKJT93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4/3 ♦4 ♠2/1 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 ♣A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 6-Hibler-Hibler
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♦K 4-Wiegel-Langhans vs 3-Oleson-Jordan
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♥A 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 ♥A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
25 |
♠KJT98
♥K3
♦T3
♣K976
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 5/4♠ ♣6 ♦4/3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 5♠ N 5 ♣A 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
230 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 6 ♥A 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Crooch-Reed
200 1.00 2.00 5♦ E -2 ♠A 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 4 ♣A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
|
26 |
♠AK873
♥K875
♦AT95
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣Q 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 ♣A 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
130 0.50 2.50 3♣ E 4 ♠2 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
130 0.50 2.50 3♣ E 4 ♦K 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Crooch-Reed
|
27 |
♠QJ82
♥A975
♦AT74
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♦K 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Crooch-Reed
230 2.00 1.00 1♣** S 1 ♦K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 ♦9 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠T 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
28 |
♠A632
♥Q4
♦AQJ872
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♠K 3-Oleson-Jordan vs 1-Crooch-Reed
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♦K 8-Gordon-Scofield vs 7-Carlson-Pitt
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 ♦K 5-Gille-Naemura vs 4-Wiegel-Langhans
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 4 ♦K 6-Hibler-Hibler vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|