Hands and Results
1 |
♠87532
♥Q
♦T6
♣AT854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 5NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♥T 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
430 1.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♥7 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
460 0.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♥J 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Gille-Naemura
|
2 |
♠A72
♥864
♦532
♣KJ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 4 ♥A 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Gille-Naemura
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -2 ♣3 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
300 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -3 ♣8 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
3 |
♠K
♥AKQJ6
♦42
♣76432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ E 5 ♥5 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 ♣A 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Gille-Naemura
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 ♣A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
4 |
♠QJ3
♥T9853
♦A4
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 ♠2 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Gille-Naemura
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 ♦K 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦K 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
5 |
♠K85
♥A9
♦T76
♣QJT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♦8 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 3-Gille-Naemura
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♦8 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
630 0.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♠2 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
6 |
♠KJ973
♥J9
♦K53
♣K87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ N -2 ♣2 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 ♠8 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 3-Gille-Naemura
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♠8 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
7 |
♠T8642
♥AQ5
♦K4
♣KT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 ♣A 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 3-Gille-Naemura
150 1.00 1.00 1N S 3 ♥J 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ N 3 ♦6 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
|
8 |
♠62
♥K92
♦K8652
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5/6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♥2 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 3-Gille-Naemura
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♦5 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♣T 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
9 |
♠QJT8432
♥2
♦JT9
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥6 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♥A 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 3-Gille-Naemura
400 0.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♠9 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
10 |
♠Q3
♥J964
♦Q972
♣T82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 1.00 5♠ W 5 ♥4 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook vs 3-Gille-Naemura
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 ♥4 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 ♥4 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
|
11 |
♠K
♥AQJ954
♦KQ
♣AJT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 4 ♦A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Gille-Naemura
100 1.00 1.00 4♠* W -1 ♦K 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 ♦K 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
|
12 |
♠JT53
♥AT62
♦AJ4
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 5 ♥7 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 ♥3 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦Q 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Gille-Naemura
|
13 |
♠AJ54
♥J9
♦A
♣AKQ973
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 ♦3 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 ♦6 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Gille-Naemura
|
14 |
♠T76
♥J43
♦975
♣7652
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ W 4 ♠T 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Gille-Naemura
210 1.00 1.00 1N W 5 ♠T 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 ♠T 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
15 |
♠A98
♥K98
♦854
♣9753
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣J 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 3-Gille-Naemura
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♣9 5-Scofield-Kleen vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♣3 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
16 |
♠KQ2
♥KQ
♦QT4
♣K7653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♣4 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
50 1.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♣4 3-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♠9 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
|
17 |
♠74
♥KJ832
♦AQJT32
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥3/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♠3 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♠3 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 ♣A 3-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
18 |
♠AQT6
♥97
♦-
♣AQT8432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♦6 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
600 1.00 1.00 5♣ N 5 ♦K 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
380 0.00 2.00 2♣* N 3 ♥K 3-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
19 |
♠AQ93
♥T983
♦A
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 1♦ 7♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 2.00 0.00 6♥ S 7 ♦7 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
980 1.00 1.00 6♥ N 6 ♣4 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
170 0.00 2.00 3♣ S 6 ♦3 3-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
|
20 |
♠K987
♥QJT3
♦T942
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 3-Gille-Naemura vs 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
|
21 |
♠JT
♥AQ2
♦K642
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♥6 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣A 3-Gille-Naemura vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
|
22 |
♠K752
♥865
♦Q65
♣T62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.50 0.50 1N W 2 ♦5 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
120 1.50 0.50 1N E 2 ♦2 3-Gille-Naemura vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
180 0.00 2.00 2N W 4 ♦5 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
|
23 |
♠4
♥KJ765
♦AJ832
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 ♠7 3-Gille-Naemura vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♣A 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
|
24 |
♠A9
♥Q972
♦AQJ42
♣A2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 ♥4 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
120 1.00 1.00 1N E 2 ♠5 3-Gille-Naemura vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ W 4 ♥2 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
|
25 |
♠KJ5
♥AJ73
♦J92
♣J75
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 3-Gille-Naemura vs 2-Brockhaus-Lathrop
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♦8 1-Pitt-Kacmarynski vs 4-Perchellet-Hasbrook
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 ♥4 6-Wiegel-Wiegel vs 5-Scofield-Kleen
|